Wikipedia:Peer review/Upper Canada College/archive1
In the hopes of refining the above article to meet FA status (at the prompting of some other users), it would be useful to have some outside editors review the piece and voice their opinions - allowing for a viewpoint beyond the three or four regular contributors to the article. --G2bambino 20:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Don't FA's require the sources to be done using the "cite" templates? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 22:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)