Wikipedia:Peer review/Utoro, Uji/archive1

Utoro, Uji

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

Recently promoted to GA. I want to move this to FA in near future. Please keep an eye out for neutrality and NPOV; I want to be sure this issue is presented as fairly as possible, as it's contentious.

Thanks, toobigtokale (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit too sleep deprived to do a deep dive into the article, but I can spot a few things you'll want to address before bringing it to FAC. Lots of the parameters for the citations in the article are poorly filled out. For example,

"www.kukmindaily.co.kr", "kpopherald.koreaherald.com", "www.thecrimson.com", etc. should be replaced with the names of the publications.
Titles like "Press Conference: "One Japan Community's Bid for Reconciliation With Korean Residents" | FCCJ" should be fixed to remove the extraneous tagline.
Publications like the Los Angeles Times, The Guardian, Critique of Anthropology, etc. should be wikilinked in the citations.
"연합뉴스" should be Yonhap News Agency instead
I'm fairly certain there's a lot of Template:Cite web templates when there should be Template:Cite news templates instead.

Images need alt text

Wish I could be a bit more of a help in terms of content, but I'm way too tired, I just spotted this and thought I'd leave a comment. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 17:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will get on fixing that. Any help is appreciated, even sleep-deprived 🙂 toobigtokale (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FAC peer review sidebar

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template.

Also, since you are still working towards your first successful FAC, I suggest getting a mentor who can help guide you through the process. Mentors can even comment on the article at this PR. I also suggest that you review articles at WP:FAC to build goodwill amongst the editors and help familiarise yourself with the FA criteria. Z1720 (talk) 00:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toobigtokale: It has been over a month since the last comment in this PR. Are you still interested in receiving comments or can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 05:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If my goal is to move to a FA nom; do you think I need to get a peer review? If not maybe we can close and I can find next steps toobigtokale (talk) 05:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toobigtokale: Since you are working towards your first successful FAC, I suggest getting feedback from a mentor, who can comment here on this PR. You can also ask for feedback from the Wikiprojects attached to this article. Z1720 (talk) 05:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I may not have time/energy to do this until late January; do you think we should close this for now if so? Maybe I can reopen a request around then? toobigtokale (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toobigtokale: It has been another month without comment. In answer to your question above, I recommend that you close this PR and either nominate this for FAC or reopen a new PR when you have more time. Z1720 (talk) 15:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]