Wikipedia:Peer review/Vindolanda tablets/archive1

Vindolanda tablets

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This is one of the top-ten artefacts at the British Museum and considering the significance in British Roman history seems a good candidate for further improvement and revitalizing considering it is still relatively short but was originally created 4 years ago. Peer review comments with suggestions for what ought to be expanded (or corrected) and how the sources could improve would be useful in creating a to-do list and/or listing at WP:GLAM/BM for collaboration.

Thanks, Fæ (talk) 10:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead paragraph might say more about the initial find with references to published accounts of that find in academic journals --Profdrew101 (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a couple of citations and the first year of discovery for the lead (choosing alternatives to Bowman as he is already well used). Fæ (talk) 10:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note, as the nominator for PR, I'm migrating this to GAN as I would like to write to an expert on the tablets for some feedback and collate any of their (probably emailed comments) as part of that process next week. Fæ (talk) 12:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]