I've listed this article for peer review in the hopes that it will one day qualify for GA status. At the moment, the article is still rated as Start-Class on the WikiProject Albums quality scale and I do believe that it should now qualify for a C-Class rating at the least. There is substantial media commentary surrounding this album and there may be room for expansion here and there. I am mostly concerned about making the prose flow more smoothly, especially in the critical reception section.
Skyrack95, I am going to close this review because I think it is suitable for GAN now. Your article is pretty good, although the reception section could be edited for better flow, I don't think it's an obstacle to GA status. The main issue I'm seeing is that the lead should be expanded to incorporate all the main points in the body per MOS:LEAD, perhaps double or triple the length would be good. But that can be addressed during a GAN, so I'd advise you to nominate it now. (t · c) buidhe17:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!
