This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review due to its format, which seems more like a story or recounting rather than an actual encyclopaedic article. I did not write it.

Thanks, Crystal Walrein (talk) 12:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The history text is a copyvio from http://www.theboss97.com/history.html so I have now removed it. *As for the rest of the article, it has no references whatsoever and is as you have stated, written almost as a blog.
  • Words like "oldies" need to be linked or explained.
  • "Enginneer " typo
  • The article needs an expert in the field to completely rewrite it from scratch, I would suggest.
  • I've tagged it as unref'ed and as a story.

The Rambling Man (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]