I have significantly edited this article and I think it is well-written, neutral, and stable. I don't know whether it's comprehensive enough, though. I welcome all thoughts on this matter. Andrea Parton 23:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • More information should be added about its history and structure.
  • The lead needs to be expanded.
  • Tiny single-paragraph sections need to be merged or expanded.
  • Implement inline citations (WP:V), probably using WP:FOOTNOTEs.

-- Underneath-it-All 21:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]