Wikipedia:Peer review/Walter Donaldson (snooker player)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to see whether it has a reasonable chance of getting through the featured article process. If it's a no to going for FA then comments here will be used to improve the article anyway. Thanks, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
My views on where the article is at, against the FA criteria:
- 1a. Well written? Better than it was, due to the GA review, but worth putting in for a GOCE review before any FA nomination.
- 1b/1c. Comprehensive/well-researched? Hopefully. Any sources that I've missed or any used that don't seem to be suitable quality?
- 1d. Neutral? I believe so.
- 1e. Stable? Yes.
- 1f. Compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing? I believe so.
- 2a. Lead/Lead? May benefit from improvements.
- 2b. Appropriate structure? "World championship finals and later professional career" is a bit of a wall of text. Any ideas for improving structure? The balance between article sections was raised at the recent Steve Davis review. Any rebalancing needed for this article?
- This will be the thing. I thought we got the Davis article into a well written article, but it sounds like it needs to be consistent across the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- 2c. Consistent citations? May be some amendments needed, but hopefully generally OK.
- 3. Media? Not much available for use here, as far I can see.
- 4. Length? Seems reasonable to me, given the coverage in sources.
- Is this likely to attract sufficient reviewer interest if nominated for FA?
- I wouldn't worry too much about this. I have a few favours I can call in. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)