Wikipedia:Peer review/Wario/archive4

Wario

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's a former nominated featured article which I believe has undergone significant improvement. There is $50 on the bounty board to get this article featured, and I believe it deserves a review before being taken to the front page.

Thanks, Arran64 (talk) 07:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"début " this is sufficiently anglicised now for us to lose the accent.
~~"1997-present" en-dash, see WP:DASH.~~
Three dab links need to be fixed, "Bowser", "garage" and "Sonic the Hedgehog".
Image captions which aren't complete sentences don't need full stops.
Last para of "Appearance and personality" is unreferenced.
Similarly all of "Powers and abilities" is unreferenced.
Overall, there's a distinct lack of references, that may be acceptable given it's mainly "plot" stuff which usually isn't overly ref'ed, but it may well be something that is commented upon at FAC.
No need to link common terms like "snake" or "cellar" or "god".
"Production I.G.." avoid that double full stop.
"Wario as seen in WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!." similarly.
Avoid raw URLs in the refs.
Author names in refs, are they First Last or Last, First? Be consistent.
You link GameFAQs and GameSpot but not IGN...
"Mario characters" is not needed as "Mario enemies" is a more refined category.

The Rambling Man (talk) 10:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]