| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because…I've recently made some substantial edits to an existing article.
Thanks, Jaldous1 (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comments by Tintor2 (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jaldous1. The article could become a GA but there are somethings that bothered me.
- The lead feels like a spam of wikilinks. Try avoid by writing "It had multiple famous editors"
- Again with the lead. I would suggest expanding considering how big is the body of the article.
- There are several sentences unsourced. I tagged some for you to see.
- "Stats and lists about the magazine" feels quite empty. If you can't reference such large section, I would suggest removing it.
Other than I'm also making a peer review in Wikipedia:Peer review/Allen Walker/archive1. I would appreciate responses.