Wikipedia:Peer review/X-Men: The Last Stand/archive1

X-Men: The Last Stand

Greetings,

this article is based on the recently released X-Men: The Last Stand film. It's relatively new and thus we are mainly looking for advice concerning things like: the scope, the structure, how should we expand it, etc. (Although any advice is appreciated.) Please keep in mind Good Article and Feature Article criteria when making suggestions. Thank you.--P-Chan 02:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All pictures should have a rationale of fair use written for them. -- Underneath-it-All 02:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. A fair-use rationale has been placed into every picture. They will be elaborated on as time goes on. Thanks for your comments! --P-Chan 03:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.

Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.

As per WP:MOSDATE, dates shouldn't use ^th; for example, instead of using January 30^th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.

Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links.

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 01:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! You need to do the following:

Break up the trivia section and incorporate it all into the article.
expand any one paragraph sections
3 paragraph lead
one more plot picture maybe? good job not having a billion pictures, but could use maybe one more.
more citations/references
copyedit for flow

Do that, you might have an FA on your hands! Judgesurreal777 17:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments Judgesurreal. It's much appreciated!--P-Chan 06:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken care of the interlanguage and category links. Cat-five - talk 08:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]