| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it promoted to FA.
Some reviewer questions may already be addressed in the GA review. Before its review and promotion to GA, I had nominated it for promotion to FA, for which, of course, it failed that review process. It was the first article to which I had made significant contributions that I nominated for a promotion of any type. Since I have reworked it significantly, so here's hoping this time it is much closer to qualifying.
Thank you in advance to anyone and everyone who takes up this task. If you would like me to review any article, please let me know. I will also independently look at those in the queue.
Cheers! Elcid.ruderico (talk) 02:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)