Wikipedia:Questionable Cabal/Nominations/2019/Week 42

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


There is no Cabal

Questionable Article Award Nominations 2019 - Week 42

For information on how to participate in the nomination process, click here and read the How To? section.

Vote on Last Week's Nominations

edit

Transcluded from Wikipedia:Questionable Cabal/Nominations/2019/Week 41 at 7 October 2019 T 01:38 (UTC)


  1. Support and this will win since nobody else is voting Upsidedown Keyboard ...? (talk) 23:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support because this article physically defies expectations. I'm unconvinced the author of this article has ever read another wikipedia article, and is instead some kind of time-travelling coin maniac taking refuge with the last vestiges of his knowledge following the great Cryptocurrency War of 2032. It's astounding. Mind-boggling, even. I bow down to its questionability, and ask not how, but why, we were graced with something so deeply puzzling. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support because Ineffablebookkeeper's argument is very convincing. 100.36.3.43 (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support-ing my own thing. Upsidedown Keyboard ...? (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.