Wikipedia

Wikipedia:RSUK/Approved

< Wikipedia:RSUK

Initial applications (now closed)

edit

I agree to the offer terms above and wish to apply for free access (please sign below, giving information as described in the previous section):

Group I (biological sciences)

edit
  1. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC) – for researches in WP:REX and its brother de:WP:BIBR, and also for worthful development of articles[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 03:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC) primarily for article updates pertaining to genetics, especially human population genetics and behaviour genetics, and topics related to animal and human cognition[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. DendroNaja --Dendro†Naja Talk to me! 04:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC) Do a lot of work on toxinology, venomous snakes, snake venom, ecology, and taxonomy.[reply]
    This editor has been indeffed for sockpuppetry. /~hue sat lum/ 13:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jimfbleak – talk to me? 05:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC) I write mainly ornithology and other biology articles, 50+ Featured articles, full access will help comprehensiveness. Recent articles: Eurasian Nightjar, Bohemian Waxwing. I have BSc and BA science degrees. I formerly taught, and my MA looked at student attitudes to science. Active on Birds project[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:JonRichfield. In the past four years or so I have done well over 3000 edits, and a fair proportion of my work has been on articles that I initiated. Most of the topics that I deal with are substantial, plus many RFCs (no groupie celeb touting for example). Most of my work is in a wide range of scientific and technical matters, particularly biological and computing, though I deal with a certain amount of historical and philological material as well. This often leaves me where Royal Society journals are the most desirable citations, and the abstracts even when accessible are not always adequate for good-faith citation. A good proportion of my work is in dealing with "citation wanted" material, so my requirements for reputable citations is atypically high. I am retired and cannot often reach the local university libraries where otherwise I could have got access to the desired publications, which I certainly could not afford myself, and I do not apply for any material benefit to myself nor to any third party, commercial or otherwise. In short, I could make excellent use of access to the publications, publicising their value in the process. I am thoroughly aware of my responsibilities in protecting the interests of the publisher. Thank you for your attention. JonRichfield (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:CorinneSD Since I started editing on Wikipedia in September 2012, I have made over 5,000 edits. I have an M.A. from N.Y.U. and taught English as a Second Language for 27 years before retiring. I read on a wide range of topics. As I read, I find and correct errors and work to improve sentences to make them clear and concise. When I come across something that is confusing or contradictory, I consult other editors with expertise in that area, but I would also like to check in the literature myself, and would be glad to add citations to unsourced material. I have edited articles on birds, animals, and plants, as well as on geology, mineralogy, paleontology and geography. (I took several courses in geology in college.) CorinneSD (talk) 23:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:SMcCandlish: Editing for 8+ years, returning after a bit of a break from editing here. In life sciences, I mostly edit feline-related and herpetology articles. I have a degree in anthropology, but am not a professional academic/researcgers (otherwise I would probably already have journal access!) I would like to use a Royal Society journals account for a fairly short period to do some focused research, and then relinquish the account so another editor can gain access. Honestly, I'd be surprised if some other applicants here aren't also interested in short-term access. Maybe one account could be set-aside for month-long access, rotating among editors who did not "make the cut" for a full year of access?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  12:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. user:Drsoumyadeepb: Editing for an year on medicine particularly with relation to infectious disease and would focus primarily on infectious diseases and other articles related to health in LMIC nations.
      Not done @Drsoumyadeepb: you don't have demonstrated experience on English Wikipedia. Are you active on another Wikipedia? Can you please link to your user page there? Sadads (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. user:BatteryIncluded: I started editing in August 2006, I have done more than 22,000 edits, mostly in astrobiology related space missions and on abiogenesis. I have a degree in Medical Laboratory Technology, a B.Sc. in cell & molecular biology and a masters in genetics. I have minors in protein synthesis and in planetary geology. --BatteryIncluded (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. user:Faendalimas: Have been editing since 2006, I mainly focus on the pages involved on turtles and herpetology (about 2000 edits) and am a member of relevant projects to this. I also assist with sorting out nomenclatral issues. I have a BSc and MSc in zoology from the University of Canberra and am a well published taxonomist and paleontologist specializing in turtles, and nomenclature. Currently at the Museu de Zoologia in Sao Paulo. Faendalimas talk 12:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. AshLin (talk · contribs) Over 25,000 edits, 500 articles, 3 GAs & 28 DYKs. I work extensively on Tree of Life articles. I am in India and have no access to a decent library or online database now. AshLin (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now closed – but please join the waiting list above.

Group II (physical sciences)

edit
  1. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC) – as above[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. YohanN7 (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC) – Doing edits in math and physics articles and researching on my own for pure pleasure. Masters degree's in engineering physics and electrical engineering. Professional career as software engineer. Recent article: Group structure and the axiom of choice, mostly my work: Representation theory of the Lorentz group.[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:JonRichfield Much the same as biological sciences (mainly in computer and information theory. JonRichfield (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Biswajit Banerjee Creating and editing articles on applied mechanics. Bbanerje (talk) 23:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:CorinneSD – as above. CorinneSD (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User talk:Richard Nowell. Live edits: 1,138. Astronomy. I have concentrated mainly on the article 'Pea galaxy', which is based on a new class of galaxy discovered through the website Galaxy Zoo. I have very few formal scientific qualifications, but I'm a dedicated amateur volunteer. 12:10 BST, 02/05/2014
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Smkolins (talk · contribs) (under physical and history) been active for many years split between science and religion related articles. I've recently worked on meteor showers, WISE 0855–0714 and Kepler-186 and related articles and have 24k live edits (the user space count is mostly for sandbox development of articles.)--Smkolins (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Chjoaygame (talk) 00:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Principles of thermodynamics and closely related Wikipedia articles. My Wikipedia contributions analyzed here. Ph D in a scientific subject.[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I am a Chemical Engineer (Master's degree) and I contribute mainly in it.wikipedia (+75,000 edits) and en.wikipedia (+3,400 edits) creating and improving pages related to: Chemical engineering, Process engineering, Chemistry, Thermodynamics. On it.wikipedia I collaborated to the creation of 7 featured articles (e.g.: it:Acqua, it:Storia dell'industria chimica, it:Fisica classica); examples of pages I created on en.wikipedia are: Gas-liquid contactor, Plate column, Falling-film column. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 13:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now closed – but please join the waiting list above.

Group III (history of science)

edit
  1. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC) – as above[reply]
      Approved will add you through the information collected in the previous email, Sadads (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:JonRichfield Much the same as biological sciences. JonRichfield (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved will add you through the information collected in the previous email, Sadads (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. czar (talk · contribs) I'm a historian of education. Active in histories of technology, engineering, computer science. czar ♔ 14:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved Expect an Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:CorinneSD – as above. CorinneSD (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved will add you through the information collected in the previous email, Sadads (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Smkolins (talk · contribs) (under physical and history) – see above Smkolins (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved will add you through the information collected in the previous email, Sadads (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. LaMona (talk · contribs) I have a growing list of articles about women artists, writers and scientists that I would like to winnow down. The Royal Society journals would allow me to do better research on women in the sciences, in particular in early modern times. Thanks for the opportunity. LaMona (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Not done @LaMona: Currently you don't have significant experience in content creation (a little over 400 edits, and a larger portion of that not around content), especially in the topic area that you say that you will be working. I would suggest using the research materials that you already have available to practice and expanding and refining articles. Unfortunately, this access is only of a limited availability Sadads (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Miniapolis (talk · contribs) English WP admin who specializes in copyediting and general article improvement (which often entails inserting or formatting references). Active since late 2010; 21K non-automated edits, and interested in science and history. Thanks for your consideration and all the best, Mini apolis 00:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Miniapolis: Hi, in your application you mostly describe yourself as doing copyediting (and that is what I see in your edit history). Could you describe in more detail how this resource might help expand your content creation efforts? Sadads (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now closed – but please join the waiting list above.
  • Applications are now closed.
Withdrawn:
  1. EEng I am a published researcher on the subject of medical icon Phineas Gage, and there's much more to be done. EEng (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC) [Withdrawn -- just realized how limited the title list is][reply]
  2. AshLin (talk · contribs) Over 25,000 edits, 500 articles, 3 GAs & 28 DYKs. I work extensively on Tree of Life articles. I am in India and have no access to a decent library or online database now. AshLin (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn because of limited vacancies & others may have better use for it. AshLin (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

General applications

edit
  1. codrinb (talk · contribs) Group 3. I frequently contribute to archaeology and history articles, and having access to Royal Society journals would allow me to source these articles using academic papers and books on the mentioned topics.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC) (NOTE:Only history of science is covered in RS journals; I'm not sure these would be helpful to you, unlike JSTOR Wiki at Royal Society John (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]
      Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Correogsk (talk · contribs) Group 3. Interested and working in the history of psychology, neurosciences and some of the most important and scientific institutions in Mexico: El Colegio de México, El Colegio Nacional and the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Thanks and best!! --Correogsk or Gustavo 07:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Matthias M. (talk · contribs) I am an active participant in the German chemistry wiki project and also interested in expanding the microbiology articles. Redoing the German E. coli article was my biggest endeavor so far. However, although I have some text books for common knowledge, when searching for recent papers I usually hit a paywall that I can't afford to breakthrough. Matthias M. (talk) 09:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. OppidumNissenae (talk · contribs) Group 1, biological sciences. In 2013 I was one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. This is my: edit count; my interests are medical topics and other. Thanks!--OppidumNissenae (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TopGun (talk · contribs) Group 2. I am a Veteran editor about to complete my 8th year on the wiki and an engineer by education. I often correct / add to engineering, science and technology related articles but I haven't been able to make it my primary area of editing due to lack of access to resources and references after graduating (and hence not having library access anymore). --lTopGunl (talk) 18:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved expect a Wikipedia email soon, Sadads (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC
  1. Hippo99 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)/Hippo99 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)/Hippo99 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)/Hippo99 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): GROUP I (bio science) --- I am a PhD student writing my thesis on prehistoric food intake. Access to full content would be highly facilitating research & referencing. I have been writing contributions on Wikipedia in German, Wikipedia in English, Wikipedia in French and on Wikipedia in Spanish since 2007 (My Statistics for reference).
      Approved @Hippo99: expect a Wikipedia email soon, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bramfab (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I write a lot on science topics, mainly earth science (geology and paleonthology) and I knwow thatRoyal Society host journals and papers that would be useful to improve the quality of the contents of my edit. Regards, --Bramfab (talk) 11:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved @Bramfab: expect a Wikipedia email soon, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. YohanN7 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am already approved for physical sciences. It is a great resource. More than once I have found that it would have been nice to be able to spice up the hardcore math and physics with a more detailed historical account than year of publication of seminal papers. Therefore, I apply for access to the History of Science journals = Group 3 if there appears a vacancy. YohanN7 (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved @YohanN7: expect a Wikipedia email soon, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eakopskvm (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Group 1. I have 2300+ edits here and 9900+ edits, 800+ articles created in zh.wikipdia. I sometimes write biographies of biogists. Access to Royal Society full content would help me a lot. Regards--Huang (talk) 07:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved @Eakopskvm: expect a Wikipedia email soon, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Melly42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) For the creating and improving of zoological articles in wp:en and wp:de I am very interested in the journals Proceedings B and the Biology Letters --Melly42 (talk) 13:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved @Melly42: expect a Wikipedia email soon, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Maky (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have over 20 FAs related to lemurs. Proceedings B would be helpful for my work at WP:Primates. – Maky « talk » 20:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      Approved @Maky: expect a Wikipedia email soon, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 19:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daniele.tampieri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am contributing to Wikipedia by mainly editing entries on engineering, mathematics and physics: I think I meet all the requirements for applying for access to group II and group III journals and, even if I've not been very active last month, access to the Royal Society publications will surely improve the contents of the entries I'm working to. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 16:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Daniele.tampieri:   Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. prymshbmg (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am working on many projects in wikipedia and outside wikipedia on topics like Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronics, Physics, Mathematics, Human development, Biological History of Earth, and many Indian projects. Thus, I am always in a continous need of certified data. Hoping to be heard and to hear from you soon.Prymshbmg (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Prymshbmg:   Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. IJReid (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am working mainly on the dinosaurs wikiproject, and thus would be interested in the biological group (group I). I meet the criteria for receiving an account, and find having access would help me to access publications that are not open access. Access to the Royal Society publications would be very helpful for improving articles on the topics I'm working on. IJReid discuss 20:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @IJReid:   Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. יורם שורק (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) active since 2006, many contribution to Chemistry articles in Hebrew wiki, access to Royal society publication wouldhelp me improve many articles.
    @יורם שורק:   Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jan D.Berends (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a generalist and active since 2006 in 25 [D. Berends projects] with around 1300 global [edits]. Access to the Royal Society journals would be very useful for improving and verifying articles, specifically with adding (and updating) references.--Jan D. Berends (talk) 11:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jan D. Berends:   Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Schlosser67 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would appreciate access so that I may better esdit articles on scientific topics. I am mostly interested in physical and historical topics (biological topics only occasionally), but I may not have enough edits yet in total. --Schlosser67 (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      Not approved Schlosser67: As you don't yet meet the experience requirements, I think it would be helpful for you to do a bit more editing first before applying for access. In the interim, I recommend using the Resource Exchange to seek specific sources you may need. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    ω Awaiting Hi, Schlosser67. Are you still interested? Your global numbers are up now. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 02:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, still interested. --Schlosser67 (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Schlosser67 –   Approved – Expect an email shortly with a form to submit before you can gain access. Please consider putting the userbox code above on your user page, if you do userboxes, as this helps spread the word about this project.   Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 06:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Caballero1967 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)/Caballero1967 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Group III-- I have been a Wikipedian since 2005, and are currently working in both, English and Spanish Wikipedias. My access to this database is only limited, and I have repeatedly encountered the need to use it in full. I work on the Caribbean, African Diaspora, Latino American and Indigenous of the Americas Wikiprojects covering all topics, but particularly history, and history of sciences (e.g., nautical). My contributions to Wikipedia have been in creating new articles (e.g., San Juan Bay, Guarionex), fixing and providing sources for others, ranging from stub (Antilles Current) to class C articles (e.g. Race and intelligence). A more complete list is found in my userpage. The idea is to bring those articles to GA or FA statuses. Access to this databse will make a difference in the quality of sources I could employ in my contributions. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 10:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Caballero1967:   Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. fmrauch (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) / fmrauch (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Group II -- I have been a Wikipedian since 2006, and I have been working in English and German, sometimes in French Wikipedias. I studied philosophy and environmental science. My special subjects are nuclear energy, astronomy, chemistry and history of science. --Fmrauch (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    fmrauch with cc to fmrauch   Approved Expect an email shortly with a form to submit before you can gain access. Please consider putting the userbox code above on your user page, if you do userboxes, as this helps spread the word about this project.   Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 02:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Freshman404 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Freshman404 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) (More than 17,000 edits-more than 15,000 was @ fa.wiki. More than 1,200 created articles.) My professional subject is electrical engineering and I'm trying to extend related articles. Also I'm working on Electrical engineering project, specially this list. Access to this library would be helpful for this target.Freshman404Talk 07:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Freshman404 –   Approved – Expect an email shortly with a form to submit before you can gain access. Please consider putting the userbox code above on your user page, if you do userboxes, as this helps spread the word about this project.   Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 12:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. YohanN7 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an experienced editor who have had access to Physical Sciences content before. This access seems to now be expired (userid yohann7 still valied, but can't access much), and I'd like to see access renewed. I edit mostly articles related to mathematical physics, but I'd like access to History of science as well. Especially the obituaries in Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society are invaluable sources for getting the history sections right in the articles I edit. (This too was approved once, but didn't work out all the way to actual access.) Notes and Records can provide otherwise completely unverifiable twists to articles on otherwise rather dull subjects. YohanN7 (talk) 09:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    YohanN7 –   Approved – Expect an email shortly with a form to submit before you can gain access. Please consider putting the userbox code above on your user page, if you do userboxes, as this helps spread the word about this project.   Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 04:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:RSUK/Approved&oldid=912643314"