Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2024 October 30

Humanities desk
< October 29 << Sep | October | Nov >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


October 30

edit

Contingent Elections in the US House of Representatives

edit

I have been trying to determine how Trump might interfere with the election, and it seems clear that he is aiming for a contingent election in the House of Representatives. This would occur if neither candidate received 270 or more electoral votes. I assume that the procedure would be to stall or prevent the certificates of the electors to be sent to Congress. I am a little uncertain on how certificates could be blocked or stalled from the states, and I have received conflicting answers. How could this occur, and is there any legal remedy to force certificates to be sent from the slate of electors? 2600:8807:C306:A200:48E:DBF5:EC65:9227 (talk) 01:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022 was passed to avoid some of these scenarios. Under the US Constitution, the state legislatures have ultimate authority over the electoral college votes of each state, but if legislators made last-minute procedural changes AFTER an election whose result they didn't like, that would be very problematic (the Constitution also forbids "ex post facto laws"... AnonMoos (talk) 02:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid there is little (other than the threat of imprisonment) stopping a state's governor from certifying a different slate of electors than those actually elected. Another scary scenario is that the chaos in a state is so overwhelming that no one has any certainty about the winner when December 17 arrives, so it is unknown who the electors are that should meet that day.  --Lambiam 12:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yes, there is little, other than his own convictions, his loyalty to the Republic, to stop him, although, such compunctions are marred by the constant fearmongering of legacy media about the 'fascist' trump, the 'threat' to the democratic system, which, as it would seem to any observer without the trained eyes of NYT columnists, who refer to Sumy as a village, who raise alarm over Chinese 'pillers' on the Nepalese border, who, who, it's incredible, you know,
I am sure that plenty of happy accidents, organized by our dear friends in Langley, would ensue, precluding any such eventuality
but you shouldn't worry, because you know that we will carry in the states which Howard Dean famously enumerated, and in yet more, such that even before the sun has descended beyond the Aleutians no contention will remain 130.74.59.162 (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't know this. You evidently possess a secret source of information to which I have no access.  --Lambiam 17:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Mississippi IP's secret source is probably QAnon. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots20:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My sources are Nate Silver, Allan Lichtman, the Times, and the Post 130.74.59.32 (talk) 22:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And QAnon. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots22:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
bless your heart 130.74.59.32 (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you see, it's the most beautiful thing.
stunning, tremendous.
the whole country has shifted to the right 130.74.58.174 (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The question assumes facts not in evidence. Why do you think Trump is aiming to send the election into the House? I wouldn't be surprised if that's a backup plan somewhere in his group, but at the moment he seems to have at least a fair shot at just winning the Electoral College outright, which seems much more straightforward and less fraught. --Trovatore (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you,
setting aside all sectional contentions, I hope that it will be for the best,
and that the general tariffs will not exceed the promised figure of two hundred per cent,
a rude awakening and sharp adjustment, necessary for the survival of our Country and for final victory, after decades of the exercise of the establishment of great hubris in faith in the 'end of history', and even in 'nearshoring' to such locales as Indonesia and the Philippines in the face of looming global war, the submarine and hypersonic menace, war assuming the character of a game with perfect knowledge, etc., etc.
Two hundred percent! A thousand percent import duty! A wall in front of the First Island Chain, up from the seabed! The bill delivered to Zhongnanhai!
A truce in Ukraine for victory in the Far East, because Russia is an obstacle to China,
and we are contending ultimately with the Chinese ...
Not even radical life extension, not even biological immortality can bring about the End of History, although, one hopes that Fukuyama will see this borne out 130.74.59.32 (talk) 130.74.59.32 (talk) 23:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You sound like a looney. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots03:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am a stable genius. 130.74.59.29 (talk) 03:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mister Ed!?  Card Zero  (talk) 08:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welp… This thread didn’t age well, did it? No need for a “plan B” when “plan A” (win the election outright) works. Blueboar (talk) 13:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is ביתדוד a partial reconstruction in the Tel Dan stele?

edit
 
This subtler one still seems to have light colorant...
 
I haven't seen another inscription where they color in letters for legibility...
 
...Other than in copies like this Siloam inscription reproduction

I thought I'd read the w was an inferred and reconstructed letter in bitdwd but that's not mentioned on its page. I may be mistaken. What was the first paper to include the Davidic conclusion? Are the images in the Wikimedia category reproductions? The text is inscribed with unusual clarity, including the pertinent.

Temerarius (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the 2nd image is a photo from a museum. I don't think the highlighting looks like it was added by the user, it looks like it was a photo of a photo from a different museum exhibit than the one in the first photo. Andre🚐 20:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you're thinking of the Mesha Stele, which has also been claimed to refer to the House of David? In that case some of the letters are damaged and have to be reconstructed. --Amble (talk) 21:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Amble, thank you! I think that's exactly how my memory went wrong.
Temerarius (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]