Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 July 18

Mathematics desk
< July 17 << Jun | July | Aug >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


July 18

edit

Functions whose every derivative is positive growing slower than exponential

edit

Is there any smooth function with the following two properties:


 , i.e. the nth derivative of f is strictly positive for every x and n.

  for every b > 1. The hard case is when b is small.


Functions like   (for a > 1) are the only ones I can think of with the first property, but none of them has the second property because you can always choose b < a. So I am asking whether there is any function with the first property that grows slower than exponential.

120.21.218.123 (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't any power series with positive coefficients that decrease compared to the coefficients of the exponential do? The exponential is  , so e.g.   should do the trick. The next question is whether you can find a closed-form expression for this or a similar power series. --Wrongfilter (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good thinking. It is of course the case that the first property holds for any power series where all coefficients are positive. Plotting on a graph, I think your specific example doesn't satisfy the second property, but others where the coefficients decrease more rapidly do. 120.21.218.123 (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
           --Lambiam 13:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A half-exponential function will satisfy your requirements. Hellmuth Kneser famously defined an analytic function that is the functional square root of the exponential function.[1]  --Lambiam 14:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hellmuth Kneser (1950). "Reelle analytische Lösungen der Gleichung   und verwandter Funktionalgleichungen". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 187: 56–67.
A variant of Wrongfilter's idea that I think does work:
 
(taking   to be  ).
Numerical evidence suggests that   One might therefore hope that   would also work. However, its second derivative is negative for    --Lambiam 22:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And some higher derivatives are negative for even larger values of x. The eighth derivative is negative for  , for instance. 120.21.79.62 (talk) 06:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fourteenth derivative is negative for  . That's as high as WolframAlpha will let me go. 120.21.79.62 (talk) 06:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, shifting the graph along the x-axis by using   won't help.  --Lambiam 11:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]