Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 September 17
I believe I have formatted my article correctly. Can someone review this for me please!
<Hello. I have created an article on snowboarder-mountaineer Stephen Koch. Please give me your feedback! Thank you->
Sofia 04:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I just finished this article. I would really appreciate some feedback.
Thanks in advance!
So, I realizad that this was published on live space instead of my user space, but is was already edited by someone else. Should I move it? (27 September 2011)
Just want another pair of eyes to look at this to make sure it's balanced and well written, etc. Thanks in advance!
Kindly review my article to ensure it is sufficient in references and notability and any other issues that might come up.
Hi,
I have created this new article a couple of weeks ago,I first did it on my own space and requested feedback. It has been moved to "live" by the the person who reviewed it, so I think is all good but there is a message in the article that says it still needs to be reviewd , so that's why I am requesting it now. Thank you in advance!
Hello, this is a feedback request for an expanded article on U.S. rhythmic gymnast Julie Zetlin. I have added an infobox; wikified terms; rewritten the lede; and improved citations. I would like to request that this article be reviewed, with an eye toward whether the wikification tag can be removed. Thanks so much.
An editor suggested I place notice here for feedback on a WP:COI and WP:BLPSELF article. Edits, suggestions and comments are most welcome. It is posted only as a sub page to gather feedback, especially re notability and neutral point of view before considering it for article space. It was and is still orignally posted for review and comment at WP:COIN and then at WP:EAR per another editor's direction. Then a thid editor said it needed to be posted here instead. Whew! I'm not sure which one is correct.
SUMMARY: The case for notability is laid out in a temporary "Summary of Career" section that would be removed prior to moving to article space. I have worked hard at maintaining a neutral point of view and included four profile citations (that are specifically about the BLP, not just articles that quoted the BLP, per Wikipedia guidelines) to further strengthen the case for notability. See the article discussion page for more detail. You might also Google "Don Martin Austin" re further evidence of notability, as there are numerous entries for Don Martin. Please leave comments on the article's Discussion page. Thank you for your input and help!
Wikipedia policy on notability says "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."
Brand new page created, my first one. Not sure if this is positive article?
Please review my article on Henriette Hirschfeld-Tiburtius. Thanks.
I just want to make sure this comes off as well written and well formatted. All of the sources are reliable, but I just learned all of the details on posting articles on wikipedia, so I would appreciate any help that anyone here could give me. Thank you.
I am seeking review and feedback on this new article.