Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Bayt Nattif

Bayt Nattif

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Davidbena (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Huldra (talk · contribs)
3. IRISZOOM (talk · contribs)
4. Zero0000 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Bayt Nattif (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Bayt_Nattif#A Better Suggestion for Style

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. I disagree with this edit
2. Is there any redundancy in writing "a Palestinian Arab village" directly before writing "in Mandate Palestine"? Shouldn't it rather be "an Arab village," etc., "in Mandate Palestine"?
3. By insisting that "Palestinian" be used, when it is obvious here that we are speaking about Palestine before 1948, is there any politicizing of the Wikipedia article? After all, today, the word is often used in a political connotation.

Davidbena (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Davidbena (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Failed to satisfy Prerequisite to mediation #5 "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)