Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/February 2014 Euromaidan riots

February 2014 Euromaidan riots

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Paavo273 (talk · contribs)
3. Lvivske (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. February 2014 Euromaidan riots (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:February 2014 Euromaidan riots#Lviv Region Independence

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Statement about independence or any form of political autonomy of Lviv Oblast does not correspond reality and is a direct provocation to disinform about the events in the country and discredit Ukraine.

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
2. Agree. --Львівське (говорити) 16:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
3. Agree if someone wants to pursue it still. BUT... I think it SUBSEQUENTLY got worked out/hashed out on the talk page and went away. I believe this RfC was requested in the "heat of the moment." Paavo273 (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• I will contact the third party about participating in this mediation. Sunray (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Paavo273 says that the issue has been resolved. I will check with filing party. Sunray (talk) 07:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
• Reject. Two of the parties have said that the matter is largely resolved. The parties may initiate a new case should the need arise. For the Mediation Committee Sunray (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)