Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Gab (social network)

Gab (social network)

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Ginjuice4445 (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Ravensfire (talk · contribs)
3. PeterTheFourth (talk · contribs)
4. Grayfell (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Gab (social network) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Gab (social network)#Bias against the company

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Biased editors are blanket deleting a new, well-researched introduction to a controversial subject and replacing it with an inaccurate, politically charged accusation which the new introduction, drafted from WP:NPOV, contradicts, and refusing to engage substantively with the Talk page discussion on the subject. The other editors mischaracterize attempts to promote WP:NPOV as a "false balance." Consensus in this setting will be impossible and a disinterested mediator should intervene.

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Ginjuice4445 (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
2. Decline - the request is so hopeless between personal attacks and the obvious entrenchment of the editor that this simply is a waste of everyone's time. Ravensfire (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Question. @Ravensfire: I cannot see where you have substantively contributed to the talk page discussion. If mediation does not proceed, what discussion or consensus-building activity do you intend to take up? Will you continue reverting changes to the article? AGK ■ 21:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
• Reject. Failed to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Commitee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)