The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.
- Editors involved in this dispute
- Easteasyrider (talk · contribs) – filing party
- HungryThai (talk · contribs)
- DaltonCastle (talk · contribs)
- Dewritech (talk · contribs)
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Jorge Horacio Brito (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
- The neutrality of the article has been questioned as well as the reliance of some sources in Spanish (OPI Santa Cruz, Informador Público, Taringa, Urgente24, Seprin, etc.)
- The article seems to infringe BLP's policies because many of the facts described there, despite sourced, are media rumours that are not confirmed yet. According to BLP's policies, this kind of information may be harmful for the living person and should be handled it with care.
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
- Agree. Easteasyrider (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
- Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #4 "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice." While not explicitly stated in that prerequisite, the discussion must also be recent enough to indicate that the dispute is still in progress since a long cessation of discussion indicates that the parties to the discussion have either given up on it or have come to consensus. The discussion in this case ended seven months ago and the article has not been edited substantially in a couple of months. The filing party is free to seek to restart discussion at the article talk page. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)[reply]
