Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sean Hannity

Sean Hannity

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. RemoteControl97 (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Cwobeel (talk · contribs)
3. Niteshift36 (talk · contribs)
4. Malerooster (talk · contribs)
5. 2600:1006:B10A:B052:B945:D20A:9451:85D (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Sean Hannity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Sean Hannity#Hal Turner speculation

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Should the allegation that Hannity associated with Turner feature in the article? If yes, to what extent?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. RemoteControl97 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
2. Disagree. this issue isn't even close to this level yet. The WP:SPA that filed this hasn't tried any options. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
3. Given that Niteshift36 disagrees, there is no point in agreeing. Niteshift36 needs to engage productively and find common ground rather than just oppose. - Cwobeel (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Chairperson's note: Responding parties must immediately cease discussion of conduct; this is not the place for that and will not be allowed to continue. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)
• Reject: Failed to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)