Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Somaliland map

Somaliland map

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Dandaawi (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. AcidSnow (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Somaliland
2. Puntland

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Somaliland#Map

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

which one of these three maps should we use for Somaliland Republic ??? #[[image:LocationBrSomaliland.png|thumb]] # [[image:LocationSomaliland3.png|thumb]] # [[image:Map_of_Somaliland_within_Somalia.png|thumb]]

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Dandaawi (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
2. Nope. This could have easly been resolved on the talk page but the user opted to make numerous personal attacks instead (see here where I list several of them: [1]). Oddly enough, he denied making any while he continued to make more. More importantly, there already is a consensus with three other users, but Dandaawi continues to deny it existence. AcidSnow (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I did not not deny any thing. Only you and me commented in the talk page and the other guy whose comments where removed for unknown reason. He too did not agree with you. I tried my best to seek solution. But you did not respond my requests responsibly. How can we resolve dispute when you are avoiding to understand my points ? i suggested that we should use one of the above red colored images (look right). Especially the middle one to display the disputed area without Fabricating any thing or hiding Somalilang location in the global map. Dandaawi (talk) 20:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I already explained this before: Hadraa was a sock of the banned user Muktar allebbey making his inputs worthless. Though, he was already a disruptive user anyways which further devalued his input. His comments weren't removed for some "unknown reason" but rather per WP:SOCKHELP. More importantly, you did deny the already existing consensus. This didn't occur just once but numerous times: "All i see is you against the world. i see no consnsus". As for denying the attacks see here: "I did not attack you personally". Dude, you said I have a "wanlweyn attitude" right after that.... Anyways, I haven't avoided any of your points, let alone failed to understand them. AcidSnow (talk) 23:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Failed to satisfy Prerequisite to mediation #5 "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)