Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Administrator instructions
Pending changes reviewer allows a user to accept or reject pending changes to articles under pending changes protection.
Prerequisites
editDuring the trial period for Pending Changes and the Reviewer permission, criteria for requesting the reviewer permission were specified as follows:
- Have an account, and routinely edit.
- Have a reasonable editing history – as a guide, enough edits that a track record can be established.
- Have read our policy on vandalism and understand what is and what is not vandalism.
- Are familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not.
- Are familiar with the basic legal policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights.
- Have read the guideline on reviewing.
No consensus to change these criteria came out of the RfC following the trial period, so they are still in effect.
Tools that may assist in evaluating a candidate's suitability:
Responding to requests
editNote if a request was recently declined for a given user/permission, a bot will comment with a link to that discussion. You may wish to ping the administrator who declined the previous request asking for their input before responding to the new request.
To grant the permission:
- Grant the user right(s) to the user at Special:UserRights. Indicate the request was approved at WP:PERM (or a specific page therein) in the "Reason", along with any other information you deem appropriate.
- Issue the corresponding notification template to the user for the permissions that were added:
To respond to the request:
- On the permissions page, mark the request as approved or denied using {{done}} or {{not done}}. Include any relevant rationale for the decision. If you are revoking a permission, use the template {{revoked}} which will archive as done. If the user has withdrawn their request, you can mark it as {{withdrawn}} which will archive as not done. For some permissions, there is a convenient template for canned responses, such as with Confirmed and Rollback.
- 36 hours after the last comment was made (or whatever is specified in the config), a bot will automatically archive the request. You can force the bot to archive as soon as possible with the code
{{User:MusikBot/archivenow}}
Helper script: The above process can be expedited using the script User:MusikAnimal/userRightsManager.js. Once installed, click "assign permissions" on any PERM page, enter optional closing remarks in the popup dialog, and the script will grant the right with a permalink to the discussion, and issue the corresponding talk page template.
To override where the bot archives, use {{User:MusikBot/override|d}}
for approved, or {{User:MusikBot/override|nd}}
for denied. This will override any other {{done}} or {{not done}} templates, and make the bot ignore the user's rights.
To re-open a request, deactivate the resolution template using the code {{tl|template name}}
, as with {{done}} or {{not done}}. Strikethroughs like <s>{{done}}</s>
or other means to suppress the original resolution template will still be registered as resolved by the bot. Only deactivating or removing the template will work.
Archiving
All requests are archived at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive as approved or denied. This is done as a historical reference, namely so that admins can review previously declined requests.
N hours after the last comment was made on a request (as specified by the bot's config), the discussion is removed from that page and an entry containing a PermaLink to the discussion is added to the archives, noting the user and the permission. This archiving process is fully automated and should not be attempted manually.
Bot clerking
For convenience, the requests for permissions pages are clerked by MusikBot. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk for more information on the tasks and how to configure them.