Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Archive 1

< Wikipedia:Requests for rollback

User:Trey

edit

Quicker way to revert vandalism; twinkle seems to be quite buggy on my hardware. —trey(wiki) 23:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Majorly (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Stwalkerster

edit

Quicker and more efficient to fight vandalism with on WP:NPP and WP:RCP. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 23:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Ryan Postlethwaite 23:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Betacommand

edit

βcommand 23:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done. east.718 at 23:21, January 9, 2008

User:DB II

edit

When on holidays/in internet cafes/other circumstances require, this is my confirmed alternate account. Would be useful to have rollback on it. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done -- tariqabjotu 23:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rodhullandemu

edit

I spend quite some time reverting vandalism using Twinkle, and anything that speeds up this process would be useful

  Done Majorly (talk) 23:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vox Rationis

edit

Currently have used AWB and TWINKLE, reverted quite a bit of vandalism, ready for a slightly better tool. --Vox Rationis (Talk | contribs) 23:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done. east.718 at 23:34, January 9, 2008
Messed up the link (doesn't work with spaces). My apologies. I have fixed the addition of rollback. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like user:east718 noticed and was able to grant the privilege anyway. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 23:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's an interesting bug, granting rights to a non-user. east.718 at 23:40, January 9, 2008
No, it's not a bug; I meant you gave the privileges to the correct user account in spite of the link being wrong. Someone changed the template, but then noticed their mistake and reverted it. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 23:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected the template. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently User:Vox exists. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Soleil

edit

Easier vandalism reversion. I (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done. Maxim(talk) 23:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scarian

edit

Strong experience with vandal hunting; would make the process more efficient. ScarianCall me Pat 23:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Majorly (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChazBeckett

edit

I haven't had a chance to install Twinkle, but I would like a quicker way to revert vandalism. Chaz Beckett 23:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done - you're not an admin? Ryan Postlethwaite 23:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rkmlai

edit
Short version: reverting vandalism

Thanks for your consideration. rkmlai (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tirronan

edit

I work with a lot of high vandal articles and this would help Tirronan (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done ViridaeTalk 23:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dstumme

edit
I've been reverting a lot of vandalism lately, and seeing cases where one user makes multiple edits at once while doing their damage. Dstumme (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is a RFCU listed. My suspicion is that the RFCU was not done in good faith - is this correct? --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The RFCU is no longer in existance :) Daniel (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done ViridaeTalk 23:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bjweeks

edit
Reverting vandalism, Twinkle doesn't work for me on my Mac BJTalk 23:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Cbrown1023 talk 23:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Toddst1

edit
I do tons of vandal patrol. I would like to leverage this functionality if possible. Toddst1 (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:nn123645

edit

If possible I'd like the rollback tool. :) --Nn123645 (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done GDonato (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


User:Burner0718

edit
I fight vandalism almost everyday with popups and I'd like this quicker way to revert vandalism, considering I use a slow connection. Burner0718 (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jfire

edit
As a improved replacement for Twinkle functionality Jfire (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done ViridaeTalk 23:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Snowfire51

edit

Anything to help fight vandalism, I'm up for. Snowfire51 (talk) 23:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Ryan Postlethwaite 23:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:VMS Mosaic

edit
I do a lot of vandalism reverts. This would help. VMS Mosaic (talk) 23:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Ryan Postlethwaite 23:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doonhamer

edit
I've recently become involved in recent change patrolling and vandalism reversion using Twinkle and more recently popups and VandalFighter; having followed the discussion on rollback availability to editors, I believe it can help streamline reverting the more obvious/egregious cases. Doonhamer (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Ryan Postlethwaite 00:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Neparis

edit
I revert a lot of vandalism; reverting via the Undo button multiple times can be very slow; Twinkle's rollback doesn't work on my browser/platform. Neparis (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Daniel (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:TravisTX

edit
Most of my edits have been related to vandal fighting in one way or another, i.e. RC and newpages patrol. I’m curently a Twinkle user, but I imagine that this tool would speed up the process. Thanks —Travistalk 00:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Done. WjBscribe 00:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_rollback/Archive_1&oldid=1142568728"