Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 163

Archive 160

Archive 161

Archive 162

Archive 163

Archive 164

Archive 165

→

Archive 170

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicola Majocchi (photographer)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicola Majocchi (photographer) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jacqueline C. Moorby, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jacqueline C. Moorby (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Jacqueline C. Moorby: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Lucid_3

• Lucid_3 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a well known New Zealand band that have produced several albums. Though no longer performing together, they are an important part of New Zealand music history. -Rikko40 (talk) 02:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

• Not done I was going to restore this and I have no problem with you creating a new article, but I was slightly concerned at the somewhat promotional tone to the article and I then discovered that it appears to have had substantial parts taken from this page, among others. That makes it a copyright issue (as well as an unambiguous promotion issue, since it was taken from a bio intended to promote the band), so we can't really restore it to the mainspace. Feel free to make a new article if you want, although I will say that you will need to show coverage in reliable sources independent of the band or people representing them. If not, then the page will likely be put up for deletion again in some form or fashion. Just existing as a band and recording albums does not give automatic notability, so we will need coverage like news articles, reviews in reliable sources, and the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:36, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leda Muir (Ledamonsterbunny)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leda Muir (Ledamonsterbunny) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Morticiansdaughterr (talk) 03:03, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Morticiansdaughterr: What article do you need restored? Is it Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leda Muir (Ledamonsterbunny)? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
• Not done I'm going to assume that this is what you were asking for. In any case, I'm declining it for two reasons: the first is that the page was written in a tone that could be seen as fairly promotional in tone, as it's at best written from a fan's point of view. The second is that I can't find even a shred of coverage for her on the Internet, so I can't see where she'd ever pass Wikipedia's admittedly very strict guidelines for notability. Aside from that, I am concerned about her reasons for quitting YouTube: she was getting bullied fairly heavily. Given that there's really no coverage out there about her in reliable sources and the page was written like a fan page, I can't really see restoring something that is guaranteed not to pass notability guidelines anytime soon- especially since the person is no longer active, which makes it incredibly less likely that she'll gain that coverage anytime soon. That she apparently wanted to leave the Internet to avoid more bullying just sort of gives me an extra desire to ensure that there are no pages about her that could encourage further bullying (although this is mostly because she's non-notable per Wikipedia's guidelines). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Samsung

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sonic8Forum (talk) 06:54, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

@Sonic8Forum: what page do you mean? The article Samsung has not been deleted, and there are no deleted pages in your account's history. JohnCD (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eddie King

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eddie King · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

so I can fix the reasons it wasn't accepted, edit, and resubmit -Jessford18 (talk) 00:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Jessford18: I'm not automatically saying "no", but I am slightly concerned that there doesn't appear to be any true coverage of this guy out there. I just can't see where he has been the focus of independent and in-depth coverage in reliable sources. The article had plenty of WP:PRIMARY sources, but not anything that could be used to show notability. I'm just worried that even if we restore this, that it'd just end up being rejected again. Can you show where he's gained coverage in any reliable sources? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79 Here is some more coverage I found about his new book... http://www.amazon.co.uk/Spoilt-For-Choice-Eddie-King/dp/1500166332

I have submitted the IMDB page which outlines his filmography before and now have amazon page too.

I have seen som any wiki pages where there is even less information provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessford18 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

3E Accounting

• 3E Accounting · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Created the page as the content could be informative. Content significance will be for companies and corporations looking for investment opportunities in Singapore. BTW, I am not a Singaporean or residing in Singapore and is not in the least linked to the company in question. I have heard about the Company a couple of times mentioned here in India, so I researched and came up with the content -12:01, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Chonchonr (talk)

@Chonchonr: Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Peridon (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.

The references you provided were not substantial enough to satisfy the WP:Notability requirement for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", see also WP:Notability (summary), but if you can find more, Peridon may be willing to "userfy" the page - move it into your user space where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 13:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

nisha jamwal

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Its real article on a real celebrity who was also published by Jeffrey Archer -Miteshkothari (talk) 14:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

@Miteshkothari: If you mean Nisha JamVwal, the aricle has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Nisha JamVwal (2nd nomination), and that is where you should comment. Read WP:Notability and WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 15:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electric motor system efficiency

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electric motor system efficiency · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Capiel PG2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Capiel PG2 (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

@Capiel PG2: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Electric motor efficiency

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Capiel PG2 (talk) 13:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia Articles for creation / Electric motor efficiency

reasoning: Hello CAPIEL PG1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Electric motor system efficiency".

Sorry but I'm working under CAPIEL PG2, I edited and modified the article "Wikipedia Articles for creation / Electric motor efficiency" at least in November 14th 2014, which is not 6 month ago. therefore i'm still wondering, that you send the message to me: Hello CAPIEL PG1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Electric motor system efficiency".

For me: CAPIEL PG1 does not longer exist, no loggin is possible, I'm working under CAPIEL PG2 this article is very important, please let me know which steps are necessary to upload this article.

No, the page history shows that it was created on 14 March, declined on 26 March, and then not touched for eight months until it was nominated for deletion on 26 November. Now restored, see above. JohnCD (talk) 15:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

API Abstraction

• API Abstraction · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The original author and myself would like to work on making this article meet Wikipedia's inclusion standards. We understand it currently does not meet the standards for inclusion so if we can get it Userfied in Orubel's userspace please.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC) -- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

@Mcmatter: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It's still in main space as appropriate for a contested prod, but you may move it to Draft space or user space if you prefer. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Little Buddy and the Screamin' Meatflutes

• Little Buddy and the Screamin' Meatflutes · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page is significant because (1) the band was a precursor to the Art Rock bands of Athens, GA; (2) several of the members are notable for their participation in other significant bands in Athens, GA; and (3) One member ran a recording studio in Athens, GA and recorded hundreds of Athens bands including REM, B-52's, Love Tractor, Vic Varney, John Berry, Kenny Rogers, Vic Chesnutt, Five-Eight, and future members of the John Mayer band, Sugarland, Over the Rhine, and many others. This article is meant to be a historical stub of future articles based around Robbie Collins, his bands and his recording studio. His master recordings are held in the Georgia Room Special Collections of the University of Georgia. -68.230.166.186 (talk) 14:01, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

That's all very nice, but all that matters here is, what criteria in WP:BAND does this band meet to merit an article here?

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bearcat (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Indeed. A band is not automatically entitled to an article on Wikipedia just because they existed — the key to getting them over the bar is to actually cite real reliable sources (which the original article didn't) which verify that they pass one or more of the criteria listed at WP:BAND (the original article didn't make any claim that the band passed any of those either). It's certainly possible that the band might actually satisfy one or more of those criteria if the article were written and sourced better than it was, but what gets a band over WP:BAND is not the assertion of notability itself, but the quality of the sources that can be provided to verify the accuracy of the assertion.

And, for that matter, notability is not inherited, so the fact that Robbie Collins might be notable enough for an article doesn't automatically confer notability-by-association on every individual project he was involved in — and since he doesn't even have an article yet, it's impossible for anyone to assess his notability anyway.

So I'd suggest that your best path forward, instead of creating an unsourced article about every individual band Collins was involved in, would be to start off by writing a substantive and properly sourced article about Collins himself, which can mention Little Buddy and the Screamin' Meatflutes without necessarily needing to link to a separate article about them. And then maybe the band can be spun off to a separate article if there's enough sourcing that's specifically about them to properly support one. But he should come first, and then maybe the bands — not vice versa. Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Andy Hill, Music Supervisor

• Andy Hill, Music Supervisor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please reconsider the recent deletion of the Wikipedia article about Andy Hill (Music Supervisor). The discussion indicates that the reasons for deletion have to do mostly with the "notability" requirement, and the tenor of the discussion thread further suggests a certain capricious "trollishness" that is troubling. The subject is certainly notable within his field, which is music for motion pictures. Ample references are provided to support the assertion of a Grammy Award win (2000-Compilation Producer, Best Musical Album for Children), and further verification can be found on the site of NARAS and on IMDb. Likewise with the subject's contribution to film music earning 9 Academy Awards (e.g., The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, Pocahontas, Dick Tracy). I'm not sure what more has to be done within this field for one to qualify as "notable." Comments in the discussion thread such as, "This guy hasn't even done that much" such that the level of maturity brought to these deletion decisions is not as high as the Wikipedia standards require. Happy to discuss this case further. Thanks. Ghostrider51 -Ghostrider51 (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Hill (music supervisor), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Strasburger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Strasburger (talk) 11:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Strasburger: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Purling London Ltd.

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Purling London Ltd. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Sue Chand, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sue Chand (talk) 14:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Sue Chand: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Kelly_Bateman/DataKom

• User:Kelly_Bateman/DataKom · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page is not unambiguously promotiona; as it is purely informative, all of the sources have been gathered from the web, it is unfair that companies (such as BT) can have a Wikipedia page and lesser known companies cannot host a page which will help inform the general public of their growth, success and operations. In addition to this, this page is not an advert the guidelines state "Don't add this tag simply because the material in the article shows a company or a product in an overall positive light or because it provides an encyclopedic summary of a product's features." ("Save page" button below -Kelly Bateman (talk) 12:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Comment: I came on this in the speedy-deletion queue and deleted it, so I will leave your request to another admin to consider; but what you wrote included: "a leading British telecommunications provider... grown from strength-to-strength... owes its success... able to embrace the latest services... maximum flexibility, reliability and functionality at a cost effective price... a winning formula... excellent relationships with its suppliers and customers... "

That is not an encyclopedia article, it is an advertisement, the story the company wants to tell the world. If you think it is "purely informative", either you work for the company (in which case, read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use to declare your interest), or you work in advertising/PR and have become so used to marketing-speak that you have got desensitised to it.

Wikipedia requires a WP:Neutral point of view. COI editing is discouraged in part because, with the best intentions, people close to a subject find it difficult to write neutrally about it. JohnCD (talk) 19:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Kelly Bateman:  Not done. It is clear from your comment "it is unfair that companies (such as BT) can have a Wikipedia page and lesser known companies cannot host a page which will help inform the general public of their growth, success and operations" that you have not understood that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of human knowledge; rather, you regard it as a publicity platform. Using Wikipedia for that purpose is prohibited, and you don't seem to get that, particularly in light of the puffery you wrote in the deleted draft. As to fairness, we have strict guidelines about what criteria a company must meet (see WP:CORP), and the fact is, many smaller companies don't qualify. Also, please read JohnCD's comment above. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bethsaida AG Church

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bethsaida AG Church · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Check their deleted contributions.)}} Vibin CA 05:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@Vibinandrews: You've already had this restored once, and you made no improvements after it was declined. Articles for creation isn't for indefinite hosting of material that isn't suitable. Are you going to work on the article this time? ~Amatulić (talk) 06:54, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Davey2010/AFD box

• User talk:Davey2010/AFD box · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I've been converting everything to HTML5 and another editor had created this page days ago (and without my knowledge) for me and I'm interested to see what was changed on both boxes,
I don't mind being told the overall changes (IE if <big> was changed to <span style="font-...> OR <center> was changed to <div....> as the page would probably be re-deleted, Thanks -–Davey2010 • (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@Davey2010:  Done - no worries, you can always have a U1 deletion back on request, tag it again if don't want it. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh brilliant thanks John, I just didn't want it to seem like I was wasting peoples time, Thanks again, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dwayne_Buckle

• Dwayne_Buckle · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Moviemoguls (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@Moviemoguls: I have fixed this request to point to the article I believe you meant. However,

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Buckle (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Henrik (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Manud-Pa

• Manud-Pa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Sealgod, plz check this it my work i have to sent this article tomorrow what should i do?. Sealgod (talk) 11:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Sealgod: This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/360 Sound and Vision Ltd

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/360 Sound and Vision Ltd · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Moviemoguls (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@Moviemoguls: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Check out WP:Your first article and WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Jamie Harney

• Jamie Harney · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted at AfD today BUT it now passes WP:NFOOTBALL and is valid, so please can the previous edit history be restored. Thanks -JMHamo (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done. I understand he now meets NFOOTY, but it would be courteous to explain to the closing admin, Northamerica1000, why you have over-ridden his close. JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@JohnCD:.. Yeah, sorry about that. I've left Northamerica1000 a note on his Talk page apologising. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:William M. Krasilovsky

• Draft:William M. Krasilovsky · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sedaray (talk) 07:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Sedaray: I'm restoring it, but with this warning: you will have to pretty much re-write the entire thing from scratch. The entire article is written in such a casual tone that it almost comes across as a promotional article. It's not so bad that you have to TNT the entire thing, but you will need to re-write substantial portions of it. It actually reads like it was something you pulled off someone's official website, meaning that it reads like it is a copyright violation. Since I can't find the original source I'm restoring it, but I'd still highly recommend re-writing it. You will also need better sourcing to show notability, as writing books and being involved with influential people does not automatically mean that he has notability. (WP:NOTINHERITED) You need coverage of Krasilovsky himself as opposed to just a link to a book he wrote. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VREAM

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VREAM · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 64.134.146.4, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 64.134.146.4 (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCall College

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCall College · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, DrLBWilliams, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DrLBWilliams (talk) 20:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@DrLBWilliams: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Notability (organizations and companies and WP:MISSION. JohnCD (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Shaikh_Basheed

• Shaikh_Basheed · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page is about well know person. I request for undeletion of this page. More reliable reference and linked will be added after this. -Chiragpatil193 (talk) 20:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. We also do not undelete A7 speedy deletions here. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chiragpatil193: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaikh Basheed, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Elmore Allen

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Elmore Allen · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jasstbenson (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Elmore Allen

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@Jasstbenson: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Detroit Rocks

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Detroit Rocks · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Another individual wishes to work on this page.  :) -InfoSaw (talk) 01:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 03:59, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

@InfoSaw:  Done, in fact this was restored back in August after you made this request, but you have done nothing with it. It is still there to be worked on. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William M. Krasilovsky/dump later

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William M. Krasilovsky/dump later · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 2602:306:BCBB:7270:217:F2FF:FE06:A885, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:BCBB:7270:217:F2FF:FE06:A885 (talk) 07:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Not done There was nothing there to restore. It was a completely blank entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Just in case, I checked Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William M. Krasilovsky (without "dump later"), but that was blank, too. JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

...but now I see there was something in Draft space, see below! JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

en.wikipedia.org/azimo

• Azimo · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 | afd4 ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "The page has been in existence for over 2 years and Azimo is the worlds most complete money transfer service, serving more people in more languages, currencies and countries than any other digital service. It partners with many of the worlds largest financial institutions. It was reported in over 3,000 publications that the business was approached by Facebook as an acquisition target in February 2014 and a co-founder was offered the role of Business Development at FB as part of what will in 2015 be launched as the Whatsapp payment integration. The company has appeared in 15,000 print articles over past year on services such as the BBC, CNN, Forbes, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Telegraph, Times of India, El Pais, Le Monde, Reuters etc. The company has won every major award in the startup and technology sector and just 3 days ago was awarded The Mayor of London's FinTech award." button below -Thesocialpro (talk) 09:59, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

@Thesocialpro: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azimo, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

mossclone

• Mossclone · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Since the page "Mossclone" doesn't exist anymore and I can't find a record in the "proposed deletion" section either, I'm unable to find out why the former page "Mossclone" is redirected to the page "Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development" -Dr. Esra (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: The page has not been deleted. It was redirected with edit summary "#REDIRECT Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development non-notable ephemeral project". Click on "| History |" above to see the edit history. --220 of ^Borg 17:32, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Alcohol abuse in Ireland

• Draft:Alcohol abuse in Ireland · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am a business school student. This page deleted is a group exercise of my Information Technology Skills class. We really need a copy of it to complete our exercise. And also we will correct this cost-paste problems as soon as possible, if you can undelete our page.

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G12. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We will not, under any circumstances, restore copy-pasted material or provide a copy of same, on the grounds that you still have access to the source you lifted the text from and such text puts Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. You must restart from scratch. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 03:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Jéské Couriano:, @Mengyu11:, @Huon: Maybe we could e-mail them a copy? That's always an option in cases like this, although it absolutely cannot be restored to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• We don't email copies of G12s on the grounds that if they copy-pasted it, they clearly have access to the source(s) the article was lifted from and thus a copy is redundant. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:57, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• We will not try to put the content of this page on Wikipedia again. We only need this copy to complete our exercise, and we will only use this copy in our exercise. Please send us it's copy, we really need it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mengyu11 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Mengyu11: I will email you a copy if you enable email on your account. To do that, click "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• @JohnCD: I have enabled my email. Thank you so much!

 Done - text emailed. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• @JohnCD:, @Jéské Couriano:, @Huon: Can we submit the page again if we change the problematical content, adn only keep our orginal words? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mengyu11 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

You can submit a new draft on the same topic, but you should make sure that you summarize in your own words what the sources report; don't just copy-paste them. Huon (talk) 13:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Comment I should mention that the draft as it currently stands is (almost) identical to the deleted version, with the exact same copyright issues. Primefac (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

I have deleted it once again. I'm less than impressed and would argue for additional consequences if we have to delete any further copyright violations from the same group. Huon (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Robert Daniel Ryan ( Artist )

• Robert Daniel Ryan (Artist) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

notable artist -Johncurtispaz (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

 Not done Doesn't seem to be notable. Talk to the deleting admin Bbb23 if you disagree. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fakoor Meghnatis Spadana (FMS)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fakoor Meghnatis Spadana (FMS) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Fmsco, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fmsco (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dublin City Tribute Band

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dublin City Tribute Band · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 80.195.221.243, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.195.221.243 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ahmed Angelus Amin

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ahmed Angelus Amin · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Frooloop, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frooloop (talk) 10:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

@Frooloop:  Not done. This is the English-language Wikipedia, but your draft article was in Swedish. Also, most of it was copied from sv:Stefan Löfven, and the remaining part gave no indication that Angelus Ahmed Amin is notable enough, in Wikipedia's sense, to have an encyclopedia article. If you want to submit it again, you should submit it to the Swedish Wikipedia, but first read sv:Wikipedia:Skriv en ny artikel and sv:Wikipedia:Relevans. JohnCD (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/August Schram

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/August Schram · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 91.141.1.196, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. will rewrite the content in encyclopedic manner 91.141.1.196 (talk) 11:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hindustan Industrial Research

• Hindustan industrial research · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your 'we haven't advertise anything other than providing certain details about our organization and their directors information. we provided certain informations like how the company was actually started, when it was started, who are all the board of directors, what is the mission & vision of the organization, what are all the group companies associated with hindustan and etc. we have clearly gone the wikipedia pages of other companies like Ford, Reliance, Tata, and every where we found same kind of informations only. Hence we request the deleting administrator to once again go-through our page and please reconsider your opinion about our organization details in wikipedia. If any of the data's that were found wrong, the organization will take cover of that one. We assure the same. Meanwhile, wikipedia also provides options for edit. So that anyone from the public can edit the wrongful informations. We request the deleting administrator to reconsider his opinion. If you still need changes to be made, we will work on the same and we wil try to meed the wokipedia stsndards.' here and then click the "Save page" button below -59.99.37.163 (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. With its mission statement, vision statement, and other unnecessary detail, the article looked more like a publicity brochure than something you would find in an encyclopedia of human knowledge. You are prohibited from using Wikipedia as a publicity medium. What WP:OTHERSTUFF may or may not exist has no bearing here, each article stands or falls on its own merits. Furthermore, it could also have been deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 because the article made no credible claim of significance, and cited zero sources as evidence of notability. See WP:CORP to learn the criteria a company must meet before it merits an article here.

It is obvious that "you" are unaware of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. If you have a conflict of interest, your only realistic venue is to submit an article via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Percy Abeysekara (2nd request)

• Percy Abeysekara · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page could be improved and the reason for deletion was G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I don't see how its as mentioned -DireGraph (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The article was nominated for speedy deletion in accordance with both WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11, because it failed to assert a credible claim of significance for the subject, and it was unambiguously promotional. If you disagree, take it up with the deleting administrator Bbb23. Nevertheless, you should realize that subjective descriptors such as "long-serving" and "most famous", and marketing puffery such as "hardly a cricket ground in the world that he has not circled with the Lion Flag" are unambiguously promotional. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of human knowledge, not a medium for publicity. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:32, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

The Paddy Dakar

• The Paddy Dakar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -87.198.162.142 (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Why was this deleted ? I am an organizer of this event

It was deleted because the event isn't notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia (see WP:CSD#A7), and it was unambiguously promotional (see WP:CSD#G11). Also, the organizer of the event has a conflict of interest and should not be writing or editing an article about it (see WP:Conflict of interest). If you are User:Paddy Dakar, then you also should not be evading your block to post anywhere else but your talk page (see WP:EVASION). ~Amatulić (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Living advantage, Inc.

• Living advantage, Inc. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

As a third party person, I believe the page should not be deleted. I already knew this non-profit agency for years and I think they are good enough to own a wikipedia page. Or could you give me the specific reason why this page looks like an advertisement? I think my words are neutral, and this page is about this organization, so of course it will look like only promote this group. Thanks for your time and help. -Yupingw (talk) 23:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Neutral? There were several instances of unsubstantiated subjective descriptors such as "vital" documents, "highly" secured, "leading" NPO, and so forth, cited to the organization's own web site rather than independent reliable sources. The overall article comes across as a corporate brochure, with unnecessary details about "impact" and philosophy. The article could have also been deleted on notability grounds, since there was no evidence of significant coverage (not just mentions or directly listings or IRS filings) in reliable independent sources. Feel free to ask the deleting administrator Cryptic for further clarification and possibly restoration to draft space or your sandbox for further improvement. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Mary Helen Clark

• Mary Helen Clark · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

This page appears to be marked for deletion because of a lack of consensus on WP:AFD. One user appeared determined to get the page deleted, regardless of all efforts to correct or improve the quality of the page in each of the areas questioned. The article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion and, if this action results in deletion, I would like to request its undeletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikilada (talk • contribs) 17:17, 1 December 2014

@Nikilada: this page is only for requesting restoration of articles which have been deleted. The result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Helen Clark was no consensus, which defaults to keep. If you have disagreements about the content, they should be settled by discussion on the talk page, see WP:BRD. JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion on this. Thanks for clearing that up for me! Nikilada (talk) 02:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

dear sir again ad this link ..because all engineering college available this link..kindly again add this link..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Engineering_colleges_in_India

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -182.65.164.92 (talk) 09:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC) DEar sir

 we need add this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Engineering_colleges_in_India if open delete this page..kindly again add this link.very helpful about universiy of engineering college details

Not done The page was renamed to the more general Category:Engineering universities and colleges in India. Huon (talk) 09:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ride (magazine)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ride (magazine) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Conrod99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Conrod99 (talk) 08:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Baltic Fleet (band)

• Baltic Fleet (band) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Disagree with concern that artist is unremarkable - former touring member of Echo & The Bunnymen and winner of Liverpool's 'GIT' Award in 2013 (see Music of Liverpool), nominee for Liverpool Music Awards Album Of The Year (alongside Miles Kane and The Coral's Ian Skelly) as well as appearing in Rough Trade's Albums Of The Year and more. Will add info to reinstated page -UKw1zard (talk) 10:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

@UKw1zard: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user RadioFan (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article was deleted over three years ago, so you can update it with their achievements since then. Check out WP:BAND, and note that notability is not inherited from collaborators. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Katrin Johansson

• Katrin Johansson · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I request undelete article Katrin Johansson, as it is important for Finland to have good songwriters, as in Finland there are not so many. Katrn Johansson is a good songwriter who is influencing Finnish misic culture and develop intercultural competence. -Lifelinetracks (talk) 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

@Lifelinetracks: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Peacefeather

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chrom2010 (talk) 21:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. but your sandbox is restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Chrom2010/sandbox

• User:Chrom2010/sandbox · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Chrom2010, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chrom2010 (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anacrusis

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anacrusis · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

50.153.113.138 (talk) 16:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willie Buck

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willie Buck · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I have been ill and was unable to complete my work. I am cancer free and would like to continue my page. -Monorail1126*User:Monorail11261/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] I, Monorail1126, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Monorail1126 (talk) 19:06, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Monorail1126 (talk) 02:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Done see User:Monorail11261/sandbox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tom Hillmann

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tom Hillmann · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Performersmedia (talk) 21:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. I will note your username is unacceptable, and I suggest you request a name change as soon as possible to avoid being blocked. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Ahmad Hasan Al-Zu'bi

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Aak1982 (talk) 22:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I have added a page about Ahmad Hasan Al-Zu'bi as part of a project I am working on, (a biography of a Jordanian writer, columnist and satirist). The project is about the Jordanian political satire. I chiefly aim to cover this genre and write about it in English since no enough English content is available about Jordan,in general, and the political satire in particular. I will add several other biographies in the upcoming days . Al-zu'bi or (Al-Zoubi) has had an important impact on the genre in Jordan and this is why I kindly urge you not to delete this page. If there anything that I can do, please let me know.

Best, Afaf

• Not done see Ahmad Hasan Al-Zu’bi which was not deleted, but you will need to find reliable independent references rather than facebook. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Frank L. Hoffman

• Frank L. Hoffman · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I had worked extensively on the Frank L. Hoffman page. I would like it restored and userfied to my profile page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MaynardClark/... so I can make it a good article. The deletion was for notability reasons, but I think I can store it as a draft in my profile until I can establish what is needed to qualify by Wikipedia standards. -MaynardClark (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

• @MaynardClark: As long as @Mojo Hand: has no issue with it, I don't have any strong issues with moving it to your userspace. The only thing is that even if Mojo agrees to let you userfy the material, you will still need to ask him if the article meets notability guidelines and/or go through deletion review (as articles deleted via AfD cannot be restored via RfU) before you restore it to the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:01, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

• @MaynardClark: - I am willing to restore the article to you userspace. However, I think you need to consider the possibility that the subject may simply not meet our notability guidelines. I see that you already put a lot of work on the article, and it seems like you made a good effort with the sources that were available. While I don't want to discourage you, I think you need to be realistic that you may not find the kind of sources that would establish notability at Wikipedia. That being said, if you still want to try, I will restore and userfy.--Mojo Hand (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Mojo Hand: - What needs to be does for the restoration of the Frank L. Hoffman article to my userspace?? MaynardClark (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

• Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:MaynardClark/Frank L. Hoffman. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Graeme for taking care of this - I somehow missed the ping! --Mojo Hand (talk) 03:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC)