Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

→

Archive 30

William Yuan

• William_Yuan · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

there was an attempted deletion before that addressed the concerns provided -173.50.148.192 (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. decltype (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Clive Barker

• File:CliveBarker(Artist).jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS 2010110510008363 raised with an offer to release copyright - I would like to see the image page for additional verification before confirming. This does not preclude speedy deleting if verification fails or if unsuitable for other (non-copyright) reasons. -Fæ (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Done decltype (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

JD Lawrence

• JD Lawrence · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

indeed a reputable entertainer -Joeybgood (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

JD Lawrence's Wikipedia page was originally deleted due to concerns of there being no evidence of notability from press sources or online.

•  Done as a contested proposed deletion. Note that the word "notable" has a meaning specific to wikipedia and does not mean "reputable". Protonk (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Luther_Strange

• Luther Strange · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This guy is now the Attorney General-elect of Alabama, having been elected in this year's election.[1] Re-creating the old page would be easier than tracking down the all the old sources about his previous, losing political campaigns. -LtNOWIS (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. I'm not going to reverse the AfD, despite his win in the last election. If you want I can move the page into your userspace and you can update it with new info then move it into the mainspace. Protonk (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Manifesta

reasoning -Sorenonilsson (talk) 19:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Maybe this is a mistake but at least for two years I have seen the encyclopaedia article on 'Manifesta' which is an extremely important art biennale of international significance.

Here is the archive: http://web.archive.org/web/*/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifesta

Also you can see how important is Manifesta: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&expIds=17259,17291,26696,27552,27739&ds=n&sugexp=ldymls&xhr=t&q=manifesta+biennale&cp=18&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=nw&fp=ed958012ddba4d59

Strangely I can read the same article: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:GC6RpYN7ATwJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifesta+manifesta+8&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk

The article is factual and neutral and of course for many years we can read it.

Just this year the article is out? It is very strange. The article is deleted because it is 'advertising'? This is very strange. It is maybe like deleting article on Olympics or maybe Bundestag if factual entries are made [anybody] .

It looks very bad. Maybe it is a mistake? I hope so.

Sorenonilsson (talk) 19:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

If this is a mistake then it should be restored to the last accepted version - but there is also this existing Manifesta which Thierry Geoffroy is a prominent artist at - I want to add his link to the 8th version of Manifesta. According to 'Archive.org' the Wikipedia article is at least 4 years old so the deletion must be a mistake. The content is completely normal. Neutral point of view Sorenonilsson (talk) 19:49, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Now it is a little more clear. It must be a mistake. There are many articles withing Wikipedia which refer to Manifesta: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=0&search=manifesta+&fulltext=Search&ns0=1 Sorenonilsson (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

• I left a note with the deleting admin. Hopefully they will drop by and leave a comment. Protonk (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
  • I've restored the article, but it's a complete mess. It really either needs to be cleaned up or removed. TNXMan 20:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

FASD/FADC

• FASD/FADC · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Contrary to what the administrator who deleted the page said, there can be a revision to the page by a 5 year member of the club to explain its purpose; thereby justifying its use as a Wikipedia page. The person who originally created the page is no longer a member of Fredericksburg Area Speech and Debate (FASD) club, whereas I still am. I noticed that the page was gone when I was going to edit it for the year to give the new debate resolution, debate coach, speech information, etc. I would be greatly obliged if this page can be undeleted because it is a real organization that teaches students about how to debate and speak in public. Thank you for your time. -Snatme (talk) 20:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done - nobody is saying the club doesn't exist; merely that it is in no way notable enough to deserve its own article in an encyclopedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Diaphragm(Iranian Rock Band)

• Diaphragm(Iranian Rock Band) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this iranian underground rock band is a seminal rock band that tries to breake through dispite the cultural obstacles -Farshadshobeiry (talk) 20:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. Read WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved before they can have a Wikipedia article, and WP:Verifiability for the need for reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The Triune Hypothesis, Triunism

• The Triune Hypothesis · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Eickman (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

• Triunism (Christian Eschatology · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Eickman (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Jimfbleak deleted my pages, "The Triune Hypothesis" and "Triunism."

He deleted my book page at first because the control bot kept reporting that I was plagerizing information from another site, but the site it was referencing was my sandbox. He later admitted, but then proceeded to find other reasons to delete my work, without cause.

He then changed his story, saying that my page was "advertizing."

Here is your definition of advertizing...

"Advertising or other spam WITHOUT RELAVENT CONTENT (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)"

I fully explained the information in my book by supplying a synopsis and list of topics discussed therein.

Moreover, I followed the standard for every other book page I found on Wikipedia--a synopsis, and a link to a publisher website.

After this, Jimfbleak made blatant attacks on the integrity of my work, writing...

I've only just twigged that this isn't a proper book, but a self-published vanity project, so no real chance of establishing notability, and fails also under WP:OR. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

What an asshole. Amazon sold three times as many Kindle books as print book in that last quarter of this year, but the old man presumes to judge that non-tradition published works (which are now the NORM, not the exception) have "no real chance of establishing notability."

Jimfbleak then proceeded to delete my page on Triunism, in which I detailed the principles involved, including numerous citations to other pages on Widipedia which deal with the very historical facts I discuss.

(Seems Jimfbleak may have a thing against Christians, with a little "God" syndrome of his own to boot).

If you check the logs of Jimfbleak, he has a long history of being delete happy, and doens't give anyone a chance to substantiate or improve their works before he cans them. He seems to have a personal vendetta against contributors whose contributions he doesn't like for reasons unknown, destroys first, and then makes up his rationale later.

H.E. Eickleberry, Jr.

•  Not done. You were shamelessly trying to promote your own self-published "book" without even pretending to try to claim that it was in any way notable. Not every book is notable enough for an encyclopedia article; and even notable books need actual articles about them, not blatant promotional material. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

You people are dinosaurs.

1) In short order, ALL books are going to be "self-published books." I was just going over the blog of a mid-list author who has written over a dozen books, and he isn't writing for print anymore.

2) I'm not "shamelessly promoting [my] own self-published book." I'm "shamelessly promoting an important concept" that is documented in a book, just like every important concept in history.

3) You people are going to go the way of Funk & Wagnall's if you keep operating behind the curve instead of in front of it. Newspapers are on the verge of going extinct. Why? Because they report the news a day after everyone has already heard it on 24-hour news or on the internet. Sooner or later, someone will come up with something better than Wikipedia that reports encyclopedic information when it happens, not after it happens, and you'll be about as relavent as Atari or WordPerfect. You should be the first source for encyclopedic information, not the last.

But you go ahead and pick your own poison--it'll all come out as it comes out.

H.E. Eickleberry, Jr.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eickman (talk • contribs) — Eickman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

1. Publishers can serve a number of vital functions, including screening out people who cannot spell "relevant" or "advertising".

2. If the subject is important, why does nobody know about it but you, o self-annointed discoverer and sole possessor of The Truth?

3. We never claimed to be reporters of the news; that's not what we do. Newspapers are filled with ephemeral trivia that never will be of importance, and reporters are painfully aware of that. Our function here is to separate the wheat from the chaff, and share the wheat with others. That's what encyclopedias do. If you want 24-hour ephemera, there are tens of thousands of websites offering what they do. Meanwhile, we will continue doing what we do.

4. Read our guidelines about original research, self-aggrandisement, and civility. You will be surprised. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I have a question. When the requester calls the deleting editor an "asshole" (vide alta), is that in the original biblical sense of the word, or the later King James translation? Makes me wanna run out and buy the book.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

navisurfer

• Navisurfer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

speedy deleted on the grounds of being article about company but in reality article about products manufactured by that company -Catcher55 (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The article was posted under the company name and led with information on the company so the distinction you are drawing to claim this was in invalid A7 because it was really about a product does not wash. We can only go by what the article says, not your intent. In any event, even if this was the right place to request undeletion of an article that was deleted under CSD A7 (which it's not; this page is only for articles deleted uncontroversially, such as through proposed deletion or under CSD G6) the article read as promotional, contained no third party reliable sources, and most importantly, was a blatant copyright violation, having lifted text directly from here if not from other places.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Security and Development

• Security and Development · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

this is an important and separate field of study stressing a non-dual concept, while the wording may still need work, it is relevant and I request further time and feedback to bring this article up to the par of the wiki community. The concept/paradigm/field is non-dual and perhaps that is what needs to be stressed more. Please be fair to those who are not wiki professionals and facilitate our bringing new relevant material in to the fold through guidance rather than deletion. thank you for your time -G323 (talk) 16:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. The article was deleted as a result of the deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security and Development and, as explained clearly at the top of this page, cannot be undeleted here. If you believe that the discussion was wrongly decided, or if you have new information, you should approach Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the deletion discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. But please read WP:No original research and understand that an encyclopedia only summarises existing material already published by reliable sources; it is not the place to develop new material, however relevant. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Commisioner of Northwest Territories.svg

• File:Flag of the Commisioner of Northwest Territories.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This image would be useful for the article Commissioners of Northwest Territories.

I have reason to doubt the image is non-free as a previous upload by the user, File:Flag of the Commisioner of Yukon.svg, incorrectly attributed copyright to FOTW when the artwork used was actually PD. I will review the image and if it is free, I will tag accordingly. If the image is not free, I will add a fair use rational for the article stated. --Svgalbertian (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC) -Svgalbertian (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Done restored and re-tagged as CSD F4, so you have a week to fix it. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Vampire + Werewolf = Tugboat

• Vampire + Werewolf = Tugboat · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like this to be undeleted because i tried really hard on it. im not kidding, i actually did. It said my article was deleted because of vandalism. -Transbyjansport (talk) 05:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. I'm sorry if you put a lot of work into that, but Wikipedia ia a serious encyclopedia, and articles need to be about facts which are verifiable from reliable sources, not made-up stuff. What you wrote was nonsense; it was labelled "vandalism" because you cannot have thought that it was a useful addition to an encyclopedia, but perhaps you just did not understand what Wikipedia is about. Read the WP:Five pillars and WP:Your first article before you try again, and also Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Legend Construction

• Legend Construction · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Sir I wrote about a company in india it's very famous sir I jus made an article about so please do no delete it. Sir actually i didnt copy any thing From The website I didnt voilate any copyrights sir .I wanted this page to be undeleted -Rithinbikkumalla (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. You can appeal the deletion by putting {{hangon}} underneath the deletion template and explaining why it should be kept on the article's talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Department_of_Geography,_Patna_University

• Department_of_Geography,_Patna_University · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Dear Sir,

The article is related to one of the oldest department of geography in Asia. It is not a profit making institute. It is run by government and its under public sector. Patna University is called oxford of Bihar(a province in India). Therefore, you are requested to restore the page. It is not violating your article A7.

Thanking you,

vivek -Vivekijs (talk) 15:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Alternatively you can first improve the existing draft at User:Vivekijs/Department of geography, patna university and then raise the issue once more. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Emilio Roso

• Emilio Roso · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Emilio Roso is a known actor, director and producer and has over 15 features to his credit. Please view imdb.me/emilioroso for verification. Also www.emilioroso.com has additional information. His IMDb page has his filmography and current works in progress listed and is a credible site for all talent.

Valerie Renee' Campbell -Notable4321 (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Ron Beres

• Ron Beres · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

You deleted the author noting that he had only self-published works. That is not so. He has a work published by Running Press: Beres & Beres, Lisa & Ron (2010). Just Green It! Simple Swaps to Save the Planet and Your Health. ISBN 0-76243-877-0. -24.9.109.146 (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

• Actually what we said was that there were no sources which is shorthand for there only being primary reliable sources. Wikipedia uses the existence of secondary reliable sources as our inclusions standard. Since its a biography of a living person I'd like to know if there are any decent secondary reliable sources before I consider undeleting this. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Here are 3 secondary sources:
    1. June 2010 - Redbook cites Ron Beres, author of the book "Just Green It!," for tips on keeping ants away at picnics — without using harsh chemicals http://www.redbookmag.com/recipes-home/blogs/cooking/picnic-food-ideas
    2. May 7-9 2010 - USA Weekend: Control Ants Naturally with tips from Ron Beres,' Just Green It http://justgreenit.greennest.com/media/print_media/ - Link shows print image of USA Weekend cover and article on left side of image. Only hard copy of article available.
    3. April, 2007 - 944 Magazine (OC). REFRESH YOUR NEST: CHANGE YOUR HOME FROM TOXIC CLEAN TO PURE GREEN - Quote from Ron Beres in article http://www.greennest.com/pdf/944mag_april07.pdf
    Lisa Beres (talk) 04:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Jussle

• Jussle · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi. in June I created a page called Jussle which was nominated for speedy deletion due to the way it was written. I have re-written the article and have included it with this message for review. I have fashioned the article similarly to Skate 3 and Cozi articles already on this site. Thanks for your consideration.

Draft article

Jussle is the name of a semantics based email to calendar software application which works with any email system and any electronic calendar system. This patent-pending SaaS (software as a service) was launched in November 2009 and the company is based in Silicon Valley, California. Jussle software frees a user from having to retype, copy and paste schedule information received in an email, including attachments, into a calendar. Jussle also provides a premium service which allows a user to paste a website URL into email and have the schedule on the website show up on the user’s calendar. The result is game, social and cultural schedules existing on a website show up automatically on a user’s calendar with simply an email. Jussle leverages cloud-based technology in Web 2.0

--Lee-tree (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done This has already be userfied in the past to User:Lee-tree/Jussle. You may want to update that draft with above text, but it still does not show any sign of third party references or notability. If after a further rework and sourcing you need more feedback, consider WP:RFF, as there is nothing to restore here.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

IJS Logo (Infant Jesus' School, Patna City)

• Infant Jesus' School, Patna City · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

IJS Logo -Prashant K.J. 05:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done I guess you're referring to . That has been deleted per Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_September_14#File:IJS_Logo.jpg, so you should contact the deleting admin, user After Midnight (talk · contribs), about it. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

scoopastar

• Scoopastar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this is a real person and rapper and the page was real if sources need i can add them -Diamondent (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done Please review our policy for biographies on living persons. This was unreferenced with many dubious statements and overall inappropriate in tone. If there are sufficient sources to meet our notability guideline for musicians, you better start form scratch.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

MUMBAR

• MUMBAR · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

-Muhammad sarfraz khan (talk) 09:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done As you seem to refer to MUMBAR, this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning groups of people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

But there is an existing page Mumbar which may be relevant. JohnCD (talk) 13:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Asian Lesbian Film and Video Festival

• Asian Lesbian Film and Video Festival · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

disputed PROD I didn't even see, what was the rationale? -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The concern was "Non notable film festival; official website will infect visitors with a Trojan - very undesitable". Courcelles 23:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah, that's no bueno. Pity, one of those articles I helped improve. Win some lose some. Thanks.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

The site in question currently produces a "503 internal server error". I suspect that the prodder got a warning from firefox when trying to open the site. This even happened once with the wikipedia history search feature (wiki blamer). The last archived version of the site doesn't seem to show any problems. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Dian Group

• Dian Group · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page is not a promotion. Please undelete this page and show me what's wrong in this page. Thanks! -Saintv (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• You already have a bunch of links on your talkpage that helps understand why the page was deleted. Here's a few: being promotional, conflict of interest, the need for third party reliable sources, the strict notability requirements for businesses/org's. The article you drafted failed all of them miserably - for example, the only source provided was its own website. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Marcus Evans

• Marcus Evans · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please email the COMPLETE article which is pre-13th Nov 2010 so that I can review it off-Wiki -Jus naturae (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

You can get it yourself; just click on the page's "History" tab and go back to the version you want to read. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Ketsugo jujutsu

• Ketsugo jujutsu · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I believe this article was deleted because the editors thought it specific to a single Jujutsu dojo, and therefore not noteworthy enough for an encyclopedia topic. However, Ketsugo jujutsu is practiced by many different dojo around the world, and has been for many years. As such, I believe that when someone looks through the wikipidia for Ketsugo jujutsu, they should be educated to the fact that it is not just a single bunch of guys that practice jujutsu, but actually an entire sub-set of jujutsu (albeit, developed within the last 60 years) that attempts to combine jujutsu with various other martial arts (e.g., Judo, Aikido, Kung Fu) for the purposes of self-defense. Unfortunately, when someone asks about the discipline, I must either tell them orally, or direct them to a Russian site that happens to have the data that was deleted from wikipedia. It would sadden me very much if the history of this particular kind of jujutsu was lost because there aren't millions of us around the world practicing the art today (thereby making it a more highly visited wikipedia page). -Cyberbisson (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Papaursa (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at Articles for deletion. The grounds for the PROD were "article gives no reason why subject is notable", and it could do with more independent references - the present ones seem mainly connected with the movement itself - see WP:ORG. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Wendy Duong

• Wendy Duong · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

dear Wiki staff:

I am Wendy Duong, the person whose biography has been listed by you in the public domain. twice I have submitted edits to rewrite the listing for accuracy and completeness. Twice, you undeleted my changes. I find this to be not comprehensible.

Considering the fact that I am the bio'd person, please allow me to edit and change the factual contents someone else has written about me and publicized by you. Please contact me at my office email address below.

Sincerely, Wendy N. Duong <redacted to thwart the spambots> - 90.2.227.41 (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

This page has not been deleted; if you have problems with an article about yourself, please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for advice on what to do. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Note: I have emailed this user pointing her to BLP/H. JohnCD (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umesh_Babu

• Umesh Babu · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Need to add more details and make it available for users to read as Umesh Babu has made significant contribution to society. -203.83.248.32 (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

There was only a single unsourced line in the biography. I'd suggest reading WP:FIRST and giving it another try from scratch, possibly in the article incubator to give you time to get it to where it needs to be. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viswadarsanam

• Viswadarsanam · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Viswadarsanam is an organisation in Kerala, India which is making significant contributions to the scoiety. hence would like it to be recovered. -203.83.248.32 (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - you provided no evidence that this person or his organization have been notable in any way; this pair of articles simply said that the subject existed, without any citations to reliable sources of any kind. I would advise you to register an account, create a single article in your userspace about whichever is more notable, and then asking for some comments before trying to move them into article space. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Trust Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica

• Trust Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article is false. This is a fictional land that does not exist. Please see Marie Byrd Land and Antarctic Treaty System. This a hoax circulated by D. Izzo across the web. -Cêsar (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done This is requests for undeletion. To request a page's deletion, please see WP:DEL. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica; this is a perennial. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry. I'm not speak English.--Cêsar (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

This hoax page has been been deleted. It has been put in many times under different titles, but we delete it every time. Thank you for warning us. JohnCD (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

David Naughton (producer)

• David Naughton (producer) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

hi, I am the David Naughton that has been deleted. I never started the page... although over time I did amend it (and I know others I worked with did so also) Although I am not broken by its deletion - I have used it in reference to myself on occasion & this may be a minor irritation.

I have had an engineering career for over 15 years & a production career since 2004.

Is the problem that - I am listed as a producer in parenthesis and not engineer?

I wish to re-introduce myself into the world of Wiki.

There are more credits in the pipeline as producer, engineer, mixer, remixer, programmer, percussionist & bassist & guitarist.

Thanks in advance to the moderators

DN Thebhoydave (talk) 09:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. (As you gave no reason here, I have copied above what you wrote on the article talk page). This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Naughton (producer) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Naughton (producer) (2nd nomination) so, as clearly stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you think the discussions were not properly closed, or if you have new information, you should first talk to user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the admin who closed them; then if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Ghil'ad Zuckermann

• Ghil'ad Zuckermann · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This academic is a full Professor of Linguistics and Endangered Languages at the University of Adelaide. He is an authority on language revitalization and language contact and meets the requirements of notability. According to the Deletion Log an article about this academic was deleted more than two years ago for notability reasons. These reasons are by now irrelevant. For example, this academic was only an Associate Professor at the time of the deletion. -Aborig (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghil'ad Zuckermann, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

GlobalCollect

• GlobalCollect · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I've created honest content about GlobalCollect, page was originally deleted because of advertising -Marky555 (talk) 14:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. Because of attempts to use it for advertising, the page has been salted - protected against creation. What you should do is make a draft in your user space, and then approach user Jehochman (talk · contribs), the admin who salted it, for permission to post your version. More advice on how to do that on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Moe Pipe Organ Company

• Moe Pipe Organ Company · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Article concerns a well known company with a wide area of coverage and a number of restoration of important pipe organs in the upper midwest -68.119.21.47 (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

• Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user All Is One (talk · contribs), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. The article needs some independent references to establish notability - at present it is mainly a list of organ repair projects with references which seem to be from the company itself describing what they did. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Added independent references to establish notability

Ekram Ahmed Lenin

• Ekram Ahmed Lenin · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

No reasoning given. -Mrkshahin (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done The article was deleted because it was a recreation of an article that had been discussed by the community, and the result was to delete. Additional re-creations may lead to the prevention of that article ever being created. You are welcome to take the matter to deletion review (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Rich Raddon

• Rich Raddon · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Notable for large "Yes on 8" Proposition 8 donation ($1,500) and for co-founding MovieClips.com, one of TIME magazine's Top 50 websites of 2010 -Eagleburas (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Lutheran Medical Center

• Lutheran Medical Center · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Article was deleted under CSD:A7 and G11 without prior discussion. The subject is a New York State recognized Level I Trauma Center and New York State Department of Health designated Stroke Center. I would like to salvage and rewrite as part of WikiProject Hospitals. Ng.j (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC) -Ng.j (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

• Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Essentially, all the content has been copied verbatim from the medical centre website, press releases and other on-line sources. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

No infobox, pictures, coordinates or anything else salvageable? If not I will start fresh. Ng.j (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Northern Tavaria

• Northern Tavaria · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Sorry if this is the wrong page or process, but the above link seems to have been merged with "Crimea", but I can find no reference to Northern Tavaria in that article or Wiki, or anywhere on Google. I would just like to find information about Northern Tavaria, say perhaps what was in the original article. Thanks. -119.224.58.123 (talk) 17:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

• Apparently the only revision at Northern Tavria is the creation of the redirect so there is nothing else there. [2] Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Just Ines

• Just Ines · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This 2010 UK film is now written about quite extensively in several print magazines, including Variety and Screen Daily. -ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 19:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Ines so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that there is new information, you should first approach user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

mark b. newbauer

• Mark B. Newbauer · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I wanted to participate in the review; however was out of town-- all of the information in the article can be substantiated and the company, Mike the Pike Productions, has been featured in 'Variety', 'Hollywood Reporter', on George R.R. Martin's blog, blogged by the author himself, etc.- I would like to get this considered for undeletion as, I simply need instructions as to how to source as all sources can be provided and I want to be respectful of Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. -Filmphile (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark B. Newbauer so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Cirt (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Landcert

• Landcert · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I created the name "LandCert" which is a registered trademark (Reg.No. 3,770,170) to establish an new ontology for evaluating land. --MSH1864 (talk) 02:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done The most recently deleted version consisted solely of "Landcert is a process of evaluating property utilizing mapping and municipal research." I'd suggest you spend some time carefully reading WP:FIRST, then make a version at a subpage of your userpage, such as at User:MSH1864/Landcert. That will give you more, but not unlimited, time to get it ready for article space. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Tony Mars

• Tony Mars · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Entry needs to be updated and expanded not deleted in order to meet Wiki Bio requirements. -74.87.123.162 (talk) 07:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Mars, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Bigtimepeace (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

La Paz

• La Paz · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Some information about the city has recently been improperly deleted and altered. This site is a serious source of informaton and not of mockery. The entry "San Francisco Church is an ancient church where San Francisco is buried" is totally absurd. Saint Francis (San Francisco) is obviously not buried in La Paz,Bolivia The person who wrote that, deleted a t the same time some real facts. Can you undo the changes and leave the article as it was about a month ago? -69.171.176.178 (talk) 13:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

I've corrected the passage. Nevertheless it is longer around than you think and if you feel other content needs to be changed, you best do it yourself, maybe checking the page history once more. This page here is only for case where the whole page has been deleted and cannot be edited anymore.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Hannu Rajaniemi

• Hannu Rajaniemi · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article about a science fiction author was apparently deleted because prior to the September 2010 publication of his first novel The Quantum Thief his notability was uncertain. Now that the book has been published, creating something of a buzz[3], I think the article, a version of which is available here[4], should be restored. -Victor Chmara (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Done, in a manner of speaking. As a contested proposed deletion, the article can be immediately restored upon request. Rather than having me undelete it, you should use User:Abc10/Hannu_Rajaniemi. Leave a note at User_talk:Abc10 asking them to move it back to articlespace, if they don't respond in a few days you can move if back yourself. If you don't want to move it, make another comment here or talk to me on my talk page and I can move it for you. Protonk (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

kolotube

• Kolotube · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted because i recreated and submitted it without any references, i plan on taking my time in recreating this article if given a second chance, to make sure all requirements are fulfilled -B0ssman89E (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done Feel free to make a WP:Userspace draft because an unreferenced, possibly non-notable article cannot exist in this manner. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Caitlin Rose

• Caitlin Rose · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I can provide references for the facts that are stated -Scottcampbell14 (talk) 15:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)— Scottcampbell14 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Assuming you are talking about Caitlin Rose: she might actually be notable. Please create a new, clean article that doesn't read like a press release: free of peacock words like "megastar", contains no blather about "represents the future of country music", and contains references to actual articles in actual reliable sources. The version that was deleted was clearly written by somebody in an advertising-related profession. Maybe we can get an article created before those cigarettes kill her. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

She is notable, I've created a sourced stub. Fences&Windows 00:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT_calculator_program

• SAT Calculator Program · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Not an advertisement. Information relevant to the SAT test was presented regarding calculator programs permitted for use during the mathematics sections of the SAT test. -24.101.36.21 (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Er, if you follow the link in the title you can see it was deleted via prod... so I've restored it. Fences&Windows 22:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

bitcoin, again

• Bitcoin · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I want to know more about it and it is not illegal. -222.154.234.89 (talk) 02:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

It was deleted by consensus at AfD and salted by JohnCD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), meaning there is nothing we can do on this page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

It is not illegal, but despite two deletion reviews, nobody has yet produced evidence that it is notable enough to have an article. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 September 26. There is a draft article at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Bitcoin. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Pragmatic Buddhism

• Pragmatic Buddhism · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The current search for Pragmatic Buddhism leads to the Center of Pragmatic Buddhism -Adartsug (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I do not have a clue on why the page was deleted. The article had contributions from many people.

It was not deleted. The title, along with its entire editing history was moved to the new title (the prior title is now a redirect). What may have confused you is that, as can be seen in that edit history, the page was vastly shortened at about the same time, on the stated basis: "starting to fix the many problems with this article, which is arguably OR/Synthesis in its entirety" ("OR" is an abbreviation used here for original research; see Wikipedia:No original research).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I, Adartsug, originally wrote the item on Pragmatic Buddhism. I do not belong to any school or branch of Religious Buddhism; I have never been in a Buddhist temple or pagoda. I consider that there is a strong stream today toward Pragmatic Buddhism (or secular, or non-religious, or even agnostic) and Wikipedia should have an article on that trend. You should have not removed the whole entry but I agree that the self-promoting links should not be there.

I have no connection with either the Center of Pragmatic Buddhism or the Unfettered Mind organization. They included their links by their own initiative; I added the section “Organizations” to make room for the first group.

Buddhism is referred as pragmatic by scholars and writers¬ such as Edward Conze, Richard P. Hayes and Stephen Batchelor, and atheistic or agnostic by André Comte-Sponville. As a notion, Pragmatic Buddhism is as “cloudy” as agnosticism or pragmatism; the schools on these “philosophies” appeared much later than the words.

Lateral to the central issue and even stranger than your deletion of the article in question is the book I just found in Amazon.com PRAGMATIC BUDDHISM, the summary of which I copy next: “High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Pragmatic Buddhism is a subset of the Buddhist doctrine which leaves aside metaphysical beliefs and rituals of any kind and advocates the continuous practice of the Buddha's Teachings (Dhamma in Pali, Dharma in Sanskrit) with the primary purpose of eliminating suffering and bringing about inner peace and harmony. In the broadest sense of the word, Buddhism is a religion and a philosophical system originally proposed by Siddhattha Gotama (in Pali; Siddhartha Gautama in Sanskrit), the Buddha, in northeastern India in the sixth century B.C. As a religion, the fourth largest in the world, it has three main schools (Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana) and dozens of derivate branches. For the strong emphasis it places in introspection and mind states, numerous scholars also consider Buddhism a system of psychology rather than (or in addition to) a religious creed or a school of philosophy.” Are people actually taken material from Wikipedia to produce books? Adartsug, November 30, 2010

There are several issues here. First, there is no plural 'you'. As you created the artcile on one hand it was unilaterally first moved and then converted by one user, Sylvain1972 (talk · contribs), as also mentioned here.[5] Second, it is still there in the history! If you disagree, you can simply undo the title move and restore the original content to allow for a wider discussion of its merits. That would also be the place to discuss the third issue regarding the source listed at amazon. (It seems to me they pasted a generic description.) If necessary, I could help you with the technicalities. Let me know here or on my talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PadovaniML/Dennis_Nackord

• Dennis Nackord · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was originally deemed to be self-promoting, but I changed it to remove what I thought to be offending material. -PadovaniML (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done Nothing to undelete anymore. Please contact the admin who userfied it for you, Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), on a possible move back to mainspace. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Caitlin Rose again

• Caitlin Rose · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Because I have supplied the article with links which back up via evidence what the actual article says -Scottcampbell14 (talk) 23:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done A little higher up on this page you were advised that it would not be undeleted, but that you should recreate a new article from scratch with specific things in mind. I'm no Stanley Milgram, but sometimes I think it's better to do what you're told in cases like this. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Musulin, Stella von

• Musulin, Stella von · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Nowhere on the internet contains the information I have submitted on the writer Stella von Musulin. Yet it has been unfairly deleted. Here friendship with W H Auden would be enough to include her under 'noteable' but added to this is her important publications, her role in MI6 etc, yet it was seen fit to delete this article. This is utterly beyond all reasonable editing criteria and without justification. I request that the article be reinstated in the interests of scholarship. -Natsyw (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Not done Well, I searched for various versions of the article, and have yet to find anything. That said, "a friendship with" does not allow someone to inherit notability. Although we don't require all references to be available on the internet, there must be some valid reliable sources that you can help point us to - with millions of editors, someone must have access to a printed copy. We also don't do things "in the interest of scholarship" - this is an encylopedia of knowledge, not a compendium of scholarship. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Bwilkins, if you'd checked his deleted contributions you'd have seen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/MUSULIN,_STELLA_von (also see User:Natsyw). I would restore it, but for Coren Searchbot flagging a potential copyvio before speedy deletion (though I can't confirm this flagging). I don't think that A7 applied, as being a biographer of Auden and a published author on Austria is a "credible claim of importance" (notability is another question entirely). A new, sourced and demonstratively non-plagiarised bio on Stella Musulin should not be speedily deletable, but I do doubt that she's notable from what I could find. Fences&Windows 22:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I have tried to help this user out, as they bungled some text into one of my watched articles. But, how ever well you shine the stuff that is on their own stub page, I can't find any suitable references in English or German that would enable this person to presently pass WP:NOTAB Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 02:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Södermalm.JPG

• File:Södermalm.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Poor transwiki, please restore the file description temporarily, I will correct the transfer and tag it for speedydeletion when finished. Thanks, -Martin H. (talk) 13:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Smart Distributed System

• Smart Distributed System · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Really? Honeywell is not a notable company? I am new to this, so I'm not suprised. But to call Honeywell not a notable company is to call a farce a process. -KazooOfTheNorth (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, I see you've meanwhile contacted the deleting admin. If you need futher help let me know.--Tikiwont (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

... and on top of that, nobody said that Honeywell or even Siemens are non-notable companies. However, the product that had a poorly-referenced article shows absolutely zero signs of being considered as notable. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Meld (software)

• Meld (software) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Meld is one of the most popular open source visual diff and merge tool. It is not clear why its article has been deleted while similar articles describing less known tools (like tkdiff or Araxis Merge) exist. -134.83.1.241 (talk) 10:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Courcelles 10:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Euan McIver

• Euan S McIver · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I have been notified that this page, created by a Scottish Variety Club Member, has been deleted - one reason being - it seemed I only appeared in amateur productions - more than ten years with a national star (Stanley Baxter)and two national industry awards from the USA as listed, should convey the message that this is not the case, and while I undergo further treatment for the illness also mentioned in the article I am concentrating on assisting community theatre projects. It seems the administrator does not know the facts and is applying his own opinions. Please reconsider this deletion. -86.170.153.227 (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done - As also announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euan S McIver, it cannot be undeleted through this process. As you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Basware

• Basware · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hi, my companies Wikipedia page has been deleted by Airplaneman. A couple of times we have had our site edited with our competitor inserting their own company names into our page. I have always considered Wikipedia to be impartial and so I do not believe this is the readers interest. We do not use Wikipedia for promoting our business but rather as a point of reference. We are Basware, this is what we do. Anything beyond that as far as I am concerned is Marketing talk and not of interest to Wikipedia readers nor myself. Despite taking this approach I am still surprised that our pages are being marked as advertising. We are more than willing to rewrite content to make it useful to readers but it seems to be slowly eroded with and tampered by competitors. I hope that we can be undeleted and am happy to receive any comments or recommendations that you might have. Thanks and regards -Zmte055 (talk) 14:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

The problem is that people like you are editing the article, removing information (such as who you compete against) in order to keep the article the way you want it. As a result, the article was so promotional (full of peacock words like "leading" and laden with promotional fluff) that it was deleted as an advertisement. Such is the consequence of conflict of interest editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

AGN International

• AGN International · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hi, an article that i created AGN International was deleted in October by Transporterman under section A7, I did put the 'hangon' quote on top of the page so that we can amend and change details so that the article no longer fell under A7 any longer. Unfortunately this article was then deleted. I contacted transporterman but have had no response from him. I also can not put this article back up with the amended changes, please can you advise how this can be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyGNorris (talk • contribs) 15:17, 1 December 2010

•  Not done. This article has actually been deleted four times and eventually protected against re-creation. It has been the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGN International so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. If you are connected with the organization you should first read our guideline on WP:Conflict of interest, and the WP:FAQ/Organizations; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Amy, Transporterman responded to you within an hour, and left a message on your talk page informing you. You can see the response in the history of his/her talk page at [6]. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)