Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 58
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | → | Archive 65 |
HorrorNews.net Company Logo.jpg
permsission page has been established per link - http://horrornews.net/about/logo/ (page states " It may be used freely without permission", original editor never responded to changes, updates or talk requests. Image was deleted after all necessary updates to image page were addressed.Logo info provided on description page fits wiki guidelines -AdrianMKane (talk) 16:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- "It may be used freely without permission, but may not be altered without permission" - I think that last clause means it's not freely enough licensed to meet our standards. It might qualify under fair use, but not anything else. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Tanuki
Accidental deletion (as a redirect to a non-existent article - the target was temporarily removed by {{db-move}}) that nuked pre-merge edit history of material that is still in the encyclopedia. The Creative Commons license of the original contributions requires that this be restored. I asked the deleting admin to fix this, but he's not around. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 19:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Done Not often I see a request from someone I know!--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Group of Four (Australia)
reasoning -71.17.34.15 (talk) 04:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Jennifer_Hedger
Legit Canadian/Sports Broadcasting celebrity, I don't understand why her page owuld be deleted. -68.145.198.186 (talk) 05:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: The article was deleted as the result of a biographical article proposed deletion ("sticky-prod"). Article deletions via sticky-prod will not be unilaterally overturned; reliable sources need to be provided in order to overturn the deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Not done Yup, she's cute, and can read the soccer scores to me anytime she wants. However, as she's living, WP:BLP requires third party reliable sourcing. Some of the other people mentioned are sourced, but her sole source is her employer: TSN - which is not third party coverage (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
V Ram Iyengar
reasoning -Androov (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
-V Ram Iyengar was the Dewan of Travancore in 1886 who signed mullaperiyar agreement against the wishes of Raja of Travancore He was a Pro Tamilian who went against the interest of Tranvancore state.Now the issue of decommissioning of mullaperiyar for safety reason is hotly argued between Kerala and Tamil Nadu. This page is not in the interest of Tamil Nadu in this dispute and has therefore been deleted. Some pages on the Mullaperiyar dam also have been altered Since people turn to Wikipedia to find out truth, please restore the page and also the pages on Mullaperiyar dam
- Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Yaadein (Short film 2012)
this article is original, its my upcoming short film so i don't want any deletion of the page -Alvey420 (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and as an unreleased film such as this has no clear notability, it cannot be included (yet) as a topic on an encyclopedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaadein (Short film 2012), where I expect a WP:SNOW closure any minute. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Nassim Haramein
I'm interested in the guy, while I consider his article's deletion uncontroversial and his work to be psuedoscientific I'd like to find out what other people have written about him. I can access the deleted article itself on the Internet Archive's wayback machine but what I'm more interested in is the page discussion to see what other people were saying about the article before the nomination for deletion -Tobiasnash (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- They boil down to "who needs secondary sources? He's interesting!" and a note in Portuguese that I can't read. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Apelinq
Please userify to my userspace so I can work on the article. Thanks. -Mathewignash (talk) 04:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done You can find it at User:Mathewignash/Apelinq. Nyttend (talk) 13:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Ramulus
Please userify to my userspace so I can work on the article. Thanks. -Mathewignash (talk) 04:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done You can find it at User:Mathewignash/Ramulus. Nyttend (talk) 13:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
old fisherman's blues
the page was ok -77.46.166.30 (talk) 08:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. It's sometimes okay to restore pages that don't appear to meet these inclusion guidelines, but you need to show how restoring this page would be useful for the encyclopedia; unless you're willing to improve it yourself, there's essentially no chance of this page being restored. Nyttend (talk) 13:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Pedro Armendariz.jpg
not my image, needed for recent death, I will fix -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done I've restored it. Please note that I've tagged it with a new {{nrd}} template, so you'll need to fix it within a week. Nyttend (talk) 01:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Ryan Pronk
Ryan Pronk is ranked 20th draughts player in the world. He has many accomplishments in draughts that can be found all over the web. Alex Moiseyev, world draughts champion, who IS on wikipedia, has a picture of himself playing Ryan Pronk on his wikipedia page. Ryan Pronk is a notable player -108.15.212.239 (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Nyttend (talk) 13:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
g.bakthavathsalam
Its not a promotional page. Its a profile of our Chairman -203.199.234.3 (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Throughout its history, the page badly failed our neutral point of view standards; the profile of your Chairman was very promotional in talking about how wonderful he is, rather than describing him purely factually. You may write a new article about him (if you don't register a username, you can go to WP:AFC), but be sure to demonstrate in that article that he passes our inclusion standards for biographies and be sure to write in accordance with a neutral point of view. Nyttend (talk) 13:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Sina Siadat
I understand the reason for deletion, but since it was my first article and I was misleading and not as informative as I should have been, I ask that you please send my content back to me and allow me to revise now that I have read the entire guideline for writing an article on Wikipedia. OR at least just send back the content from my 2 deleted versions of these articles since I did not save or back them up, I would like to at least have my own copies of them...thanks! You can email them to me at nlnoah@yahoo.com
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Nyttend (talk) 13:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
exact learning solutions
Hi, I noticed that this page has been deleted despite the edits that had been done to improve the content after it had been proposed for deletion. I made myself some minor edits, and at the same time I read the comments and saw that the content had been improved already. Despite the improvements I noticed now that the article has now been deleted. I would be willing to contribute in making this article better (I would need your help with this), so I am proposing to undelete it. -Mathilde65 (talk) 21:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Renato Laranja
Real person.-Dbutlerkim (talk) 02:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Yes, he's a real person (so am I). As such, there would need to be obvious notability and as it's a WP:BLP would need significant reliable sources. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Simon Price
I'd like to read it! -94.174.168.51 (talk) 10:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done In order to undelete an article, there needs to be a way that undeleting it will help our encyclopedia. You may read about him here, here, and here. Nyttend (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
How can you say he fails the notability test? He is a well known music journalist, having received several awards, and also a well-known DJ/club promoter - I don't see how he can have failed the google test - just try googling the name Simon Price for images alone and the top ones are all of him as he has a very distinctive appearance.... and he is referenced in several other wikipedia pages such as Melody Maker, Richey Edwards etc...
- See WP:GHITS...oh, and don't forget to sign any talkpage posts with ~~~~ (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:11, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
X-Smiles
(Expired PROD, concern was: Lack of notability, misrepresentation of information. X-Smiles isn't a browser, its a we engine that eems to be not used in actual browsers.) Firstly the makers of X-Smiles disagrees and claims their product to be a browser http://www.xsmiles.org/screenshots.html. Secondly X-Smiles is notable for its use of X-Forms, something few browsers do natively. Thirdly, X-Smiles was notable for it use of early portable devices. - 60.234.198.171 (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done as a contested WP:PROD. This article is suitable for WP:AFD as notability is not established, and for the reasons provided in the PROD (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Buddha Bar
information and discography -Michelvdb (talk) 20:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddha Bar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Mark_Kelner
Academically speaking, I'm unsure of why the article was removed. I would like it noted that Mr. Kelner is doing good and interesting work in the field of cultural diplomacy with Russia (at the institutional level!) and his writing is both humorous and insightful about the subject. He is also an instrumental figure in the recent resurgence of post War Russian/Soviet art, not only as a dealer, but also as a researcher. It was not my intention to create a promotional/advertising site using Wikipedia as a platform. -68.100.90.163 (talk) 04:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Fastily (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Charles E. Henderson
Article was deleted because it was deemed "original research by someone with a conflict of interest". I have not edited the article before, but instead of starting from scratch I want the history preserved and want to keep what was good in the earlier versions. -Bensin (talk) 11:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Bensin/Charles E. Henderson. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Bensin (talk) 12:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
The last page of the Internet
Notable in Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World by folklorist Trevor Blank. There must surely be other references out there too. The danger of linkspamming is to be accepted (although IMO it's all a bit too '90s for many new pages to pop up) but I think an informative article has its place in Wikipedia. --- Trevj (talk) 12:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- The article was deleted four years ago following an WP:AFD, and cannot be restored here for both of those reasons. Your best choice would be to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT that can conquer all the reasons it was deleted (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot this isn't for AFDs. Is there any usable encyclopedic content in the deleted article? Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- 3 short paragraphs of nothing-usable, poorly-referenced blah. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info and advice. -- Trevj (talk) 01:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- 3 short paragraphs of nothing-usable, poorly-referenced blah. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Simon Price
Writer is notable -86.184.101.224 (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done See about 6 threads above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Brian Daniel Buckley
This page is not an autobiography, nor was it finished before it was deleted, and there is a historical significance behind this person. I also have external links to which I can reference too. Thanks -Buckinkb (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. If you are not related to the individual in question, feel free to try and write a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT that meets all the requirements of Wikipedia. As the person is alive, this would require extensive third party reliable sources that prove that the individual has an iota of notability. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Endhiran-wrap-up.jpg
The image is used in the article Endhiran to illustrate the production section and the proper non free fair use license is added now -Jenith (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done This should not have been deleted in the first place, since you never claimed permission to use it based solely on a noncommercial license; if this image had qualified for deletion on those grounds, every other non-free image on Wikipedia would be equally deleteable. I've restored the image to allow you to improve the rationale. If you have a noncommercial permission, please mention it on the page with {{Non-free with NC}}. Since we need to demonstrate that we won't hurt the owner's commercial opportunities by claiming an image under fair use, this template helps: it demonstrates that the owner has already allowed people to use it like we're doing and doesn't expect to benefit financially from it. Nyttend (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
CronLab_Ltd
Will do further editing to meet the Wikipedia standards -212.91.140.71 (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done The original author quite obviously had massive WP:COI, as they are a representative of the company - as such, they should not be involved in creating an article about themself that was massively promotional. There was nothing that met the notability standards under WP:CORP. Perhaps someone who does not work for the company could create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or submit a request under articles for creation, but the promotional piece that was written will not be undeleted (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
TV Konzen
the article is important for many people living in the area the sport club operates in. There are some clubs in this area and many people want to inform themselves about the offer of the club and the training possibilities -Juliane Krings (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. This was clearly an advertisement. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Matt Williams (football club secretary)
reasoning -UpTheMightyPool (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I created this page because Matt Williams is the club secretary acting chief exec at Blackpool FC and lots of people have attempted to find a link to his page via the Blackpool FC wiki but there isn't one. He has an interesting career history which I hoped could gradually be detailed on his page. I have had a message from Wiki asking me to add a reference which I intend to do once the page has been undeleted - www.blackpoolfc.co.uk - which shows the names of the senior management of Blackpool FC. thanks Hannah
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Peridon (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Stephanie benson
Stephanie Benson was under the name of " The princess" song was "Now is the time" under public demand, PWL. www.discogs.com/sell/list?release_I'd=1638576&ev=mrb
Please check out all the information of websites and research adequately.
Re . Natural mystic. www.jazz services.org.uk/index-php?option=com_directory&task=band&ITemid= 9&id=18365
Re: Hanging on www.media fire.com/?lv2zbtsyc7haj8r
Re: Bruce Elliot Smith. www.song link.com/song link-cd-summer-20016-html
Re title: news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/England/Kent/4293399.stm
www.bbc.co/uk/radio4/home truths/0336ghanaian_princess.shtml
www.urban world.co.uk/events/id/1455/date/06-08-2005 - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dom11098 (talk • contribs)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Isrg Rajan
kindly verify the page details before making any changes or deleting -120.59.55.28 (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Although this article was not deleted when you posted here, it is now. Undeletion is Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Esquina3.jpg
I wish to use this to illustrate an album cover on La Esquina del Infinito, I can add the necessary licensing and fair use templates, thank you. Mattg82 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) -Mattg82 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done but please the necessary fair use rationale as soon as possible to avoid deletion. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
G1 Jockey 3
When I went to create the article I saw that stubs had been speedied years ago for notability concerns. There is now no reason to keep these versions out of the history, and I would like to see whatever attempts were made at this article before (however unsuccessful). -▫ JohnnyMrNinja 22:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done "G1 Jockey 3 is a horse-racing game created by Koei which centres on the career of the player as a jockey" ... whoo hoo! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Living the Questions
Not sure who put the deletion process in motion and have been unsuccessful in tracking that person down in the "articles for deletion" process archives. I believe the deletion of the article was unjustified. I only discovered the article was deleted when I went to add multiple attestations in recently published books that clearly support an already established notability of the subject. As I am only an occasional Wikipedian, any help or suggestions would be welcomed! Thank you. -Higgledeepiggledee (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The deletion was proposed by Lionelt, mostly on the grounds that the only "sources" were self-published; and was unchallenged by anybody else. You should provide those impartial third-party sources as soon as possible, as the notability had clearly not been as clearly established as you believed. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
File:GunWordUp.jpg
The image in question was deleted automatically by a bot after it had been orphaned due to unnoticed vandalism on the page on which it appeared. The image was deleted before I (the uploader) could correct the vandalism. -DVD Smith (talk) 21:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Yaadein (Short film 2012)
this article is not a joke , nor it contain any fake information,i joined Wikipedia just to make this article so that i can make people aware of my this film and about my small production company, though i didn't understand the reason why you people deleted it plus its very much difficult to understand Wikipedia's system, i humbly request from you to please undeletion it kindly sir. -Alvey420 (talk) 23:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done You may not write articles about subjects you have conflict of interest. Wikipedia is for things that are notable in their own right, and that notability is verifiable. A movie that has not even been released really is difficult to be notable. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Also note that it's failed an AfD debate. This page can't be used to undelete a page that was failed via that process; you want WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:54, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
F-Li
The article was just deleted without any notice. I was only given after the article was deleted. -Taylorswiftverifiedfan (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Flint Dale
An administrator told me that the article was considered to be notable, though there are some issues. Days after an administrator deleted my article because of a blatant hoax. But why? They didn't even give me any further notice that they will delete the article. They didn't even give me any news that the article was already deleted. -Sojdfsdf (talk) 06:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Question: Could you point me to where you were told the subject was notable by anyone? I'm unable to see any type of notability at all for the subject. The subject does not appear to meet the fairly strict requirements on English Wikipedia, and I can see that the same article was spammed (and deleted) across many other independent language Wikipedias (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Broken and Shared
The article was deleted because it did not originally meet the book legitimacy criteria on Wikipedia. However, I did edit the article so that it met the criteria, but I forgot to remove the deletion proposal banner. I would like to continue working on this article. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyrivard08 (talk • contribs)
- Done by Bwilkins (talk · contribs). Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Raymond Walter Copp
reasoning -Revpilot (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I am editing information about myself.
- User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Page live/Draftified Oh, and you shouldn't be. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I created this image from publicly available information that was free of copyright (the image was created by the government of the state of Missouri). I overlayed the image with hand-drawn boundary lines to create a derivative work. If I recall correctly, I placed the derived image in the public domain after I created it (although I can't seem to view that meta-data since the image was deleted). If it's necessary, I also hereby license the image under the Creative Commons license. -Diabolical_Mdog (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done Works by US state governments (except for Minnesota and Florida) are copyrighted and not released freely, so derivative works cannot be freely licensed. Of course, a unique image owned by a US state can fall under fair use claims, but a simple state map is definitely replaceable. Please go to http://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/general_ref/cousub_outline/cen2k_pgsz/mo_cosub.pdf and take a screenshot of the county-level map on the first page: this is a public domain work of the US Government and should serve your purposes just as well as the nonfree state-owned map. Since it's not burdened with a sharealike clause, you may release your derivative work into the public domain, or you may use any of the Attribution or Attribution-Sharealike Creative Commons licenses. Nyttend (talk) 04:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
file:ANCAFE-single11.jpg
For use on "Snow Scene" a song by Antic Cafe. I can add the licensing and fair use templates. -Mattg82 (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - the rationale is ready to be added. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
file:ANCAFE-single3.jpg
For use on Cosmos (An Cafe single). I can add the licensing and fair use templates if required. -Mattg82 (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - just update the file page as needed, and make sure to add the image to the article. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
file:Shikisai momento1.jpg
Album cover for Shikisai Moment, I can add the required fair use rationale. -Mattg82 (talk) 22:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - just make sure to add licensing, as usual :) Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Mattg82 (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Plazma Burst 2
This page was a Work In Progress, and it could have added to Wikipedia, but someone apparently has to cry foul, and doesn't like entertainment games. I request that the page is Un-deleted so that I can resume my work. Now remember, look for WIP before you delete something. -X d 000 (talk) 23:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:X d 000/Plazma Burst 2. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Alexf (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
File:ANCAFE-single6.jpg
To use as single cover for Escapism (song), cheers. -Mattg82 (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
And this one please to use on Merrymaking (Dekobako na Mainichi to, Ai Kawarazu na Bokura). Mattg82 (talk) 02:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
And yet another one to use on Bonds ~Kizuna~. Mattg82 (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done ×3 - cheers mate, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Edwin Dyer
I am presently editing fr:Michel Germaneau and I need information about Edwin Dyer (in particular when he died) and reliable sources about Edwin Dyer, and could not find any in the English language Wikipedia. It seems to me that the decision to remove the article entirely without merging into the article redirected to was not appropriate, especially as this was a second deletion request following a first one which was inconclusive. Please merge. -Teofilo talk 14:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Dyer (second nomination) does not seem to prohibit merging. You are welcome to merge any of the content (the page's previous content is located here). Best regards mate, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have done it, adding {{Copied }} on both talk pages. I did not realise I could do this without asking here. Thanks for your help. Teofilo talk 17:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Murugappa Group
Murugappa Group is one of India's leading business conglomerates. Market leaders in diverse areas of business including Engineering, Abrasives, Finance, General Insurance, Cycles, Sugar, Farm Inputs, Fertilizers, Plantations, Bio-products and Nutraceuticals, its 28 businesses have manufacturing facilities spread across 13 states in India. The organization fosters an environment of professionalism and has a workforce of over 32,000 employees. -Ramesh Ramaiah talk 19:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - the page is now restored to its last copyright infringement-free version. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks :-) Ramesh Ramaiah talk 13:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Somtum_(film)
Deleted because unnotable film with no sources or reviews. It's now on IMDB, and other film sites, including reviews. -Ookami.bg (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Nelson Denis.jpg
Copyright permission was sent to OTRS on November 17, 2011 and again on Nobember 18, 2011. -Nelsondenis248 (talk) 07:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - restored, thanks! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nelsondenis248, please contact Fastily (talk · contribs) about this. Since deletion discussions were already held regarding this page, the page may have to go through deletion review in order to be restored. My apologies for the confusion, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- This has twice been deleted after lengthy and extremely protracted PUF discussions, and should be discussed at Deletion Review, since it is obviously not uncontroversial. See my note to Arbitrarily0's talk page.[1] ScottyBerg (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Arbitrarily0#File:Nelson_Denis.jpg){kind=link}
File:Criminal Ra.one.jpg
I had given a source, licensing information, Portion used, and every thing needed, just after a few hours of speedy deletion tagging.Yet, a admin deleted it under WP:CSD#F4.Please help restore this image, as it also links to a Start Class article: Criminal (Ra.One song) -Dipankan In the woods? 10:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - yes I think it may have been deleted by accident. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Is it replaceable or not? That parameter is still missing. →Στc. 23:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Clorets.jpg
not my image, needed for article, I will fix -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - please just add the appropriate information to the file page. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
File:RodolphFaneDeSalisbyGSWatson.jpg
Why was this image deleted? The artist died more than 70 years ago.Rodolph (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done - please contact Fastily (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page. Then you may seek deletion review. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Ben Breedlove
Ben Breedlove is a teen who has and will continue to change peoples lives with the short youtube videos he has created. Ben inspired thousands if not millions and has become a household name known in the public as well as by A-list celebrities. Ben deserves to have his legacy shown and preserved on wikipedia so he can continue to touch people's lives. -192.54.242.165 (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has not yet been deleted, and is merely under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Breedlove. Please consider leaving your comments there. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Amanda Ireton
stillapublicfigure The deletion reason was "WP:PROD -69.33.251.2 (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Sharif University of Technology Association
The deletion reason was "WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection". Please userify to my userspace so I can work on the article. Thanks. -Hamrolly (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Hamrolly/Sharif University of Technology Association. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The Brew (US Band)
opportunity to improve, justify entry -Planet118 (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Planet118/The Brew (U.S. Band). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting UtherSRG (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Ucirvine-seal.png
Not looking for undeletion. Just wanted to know the users on the edit history for purposes of collaboration on an article that used this file. Thanks! ---Policy Reformer(c) 01:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- More specifically, I'm hoping for an editor without a WP:COI issue to help me since I have a COI issue.--Policy Reformer(c) 01:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Scroogle
After two years, I feel that Scroogle users and contributors have markedly increased (350.000 searches everyday), and I personally know many people from different surroundings who use it daily. I'm concerned that that page was deleted, first because was useful, second because it has an Alexa rank higher than MediaWiki. I believe we have to give it another chance. --Ogoorcs (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted in 2010 after an WP:AFD discussion. As such, the article cannot be undeleted in this forum - however, WP:DRV could be a better place. That said, due to the age of the deletion, info in it would be horrifically out of date - your better choice would be to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. 350,000 search is peanuts - clearly does not meet notability there, and comparing Alexa rank to MediaWiki? Seriously? There would of course be some concerns that your username is pretty much Scroogle backwards ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Naa, my username is "scrooge" backwards, I'm an huge fan of Scrooge McDuck. Anyway, I'll try there. --Ogoorcs (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- ...and I'm a big fan of the hip-hop/rapper known as Snik 'Liw B :-P (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Tony Anthony (evangelist)
Tony Anthony is a well-known evangelist and author and his Wikipedia page had a removal request from people attempting to harm his story. We are seeking undeletion because there are a number of sources to verify the claims of Tony Anthony and we wish to have those stated on his Wikipedia page. -72.145.180.19 (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have asked Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs) to take a look. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Even though we received a BLP complaint about the deletion statement, the article was simply PRODded. I've restored it and notified the contributors who nominated it for deletion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
AndrewLaszlo-PortraitJon.jpg
I have permission from the copyright holder to use this image on Wikipedia. Is there a way for me to post this without having to go back to the copyright holder to do the release himself? I am happy to consider any other tag that you feel would be acceptable. -Glaszlo (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- No. Only the copyright holder can license their work; not anybody else. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
YoungDoctorsImageTwo.jpg
reasoning -YOUNGDOCTORS (talk) 06:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done This account has been blocked as a spamusername account advertising an upcoming Australian television reality show. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Långaryd family
It is NOT hoax. The family's is in Guinness Book of World Records in two places so it is wrong to say that the family is just a invention. One can argue whether it is correct to call it a family by definition, but the concept is a reality. There are many proud members of the family around the world. Please undelete it so that I can improve. See http://langarydsslakten.se/english.htm -Magol (talk) 08:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hermann Leopoldi
I was just about to start an article on this celebrated composer (celebrated in Germany/Austria but also USA in past years) when I found this:-
05:23, 5 June 2007 Kusma (talk | contribs) deleted "Hermann Leopoldi" (g5)
I am not Wikiskilled enough to find the "deleting administrator" as requested by the template - but have reached this page, hence my request. It may be that the original article was awful (I have no access to it) but the subject is certainly notable and deserves inclusion (cf eg His entry on German Wikipedia and An online biographical summary drawn from respectable sources in both English and German) Testbed (talk) 08:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- This article was deleted back in 2007 by Kusma (talk · contribs), an admin who's now only editing sporadically. However, the article was deleted in accordance with speedy deletion criterion G5, i.e. by a blocked or banned user while evading his block or ban; furthermore, the article is very short... You can create a new article about Leopoldi, if you wish! You can use the Article wizard. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Good news - I'll start now. Many thanks. Testbed (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hornblower (TV series)
reasoning -74.14.48.229 (talk) 09:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Two sections on the Hornblower (TV series) page concerning the future productions went missing on January 3rd-or-4th. Have they been deleted or moved to another location? Can they be restored?
- I believe you may be referring to these sections, which were removed by another user. Please note that this noticeboards only deals with articles which were deleted and not with content disputes, such as the one here. If you wish, you can raise the matter on the article's talk page, but please first familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's rules regarding original research and verifiability. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Faye Wong discography
Article was deleted under WP:CSD#G7 "one author requests deletion" but this page is a longstanding collaboration between many authors, and is clearly still required as a discography of a major Asian musician. -– Fayenatic (talk) 13:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
File:OtherSideOfImmigrationCover.jpeg
reasoning file taken from http://www.theothersideofimmigration.com/PRESSKIT.html with Full permission granted to anyone wishing to use pictures and text on this page for articles, promotions, brochures, or programs. -Othersideofimmigration (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- You were unblocked so that you could request a change of username, not so that you could continue to promote your film!!!! --Orange Mike | Talk 15:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
El Pomar Foundation
a)- I did not know there was a prod so unable to contest. b)- Reasons for deletion were "Expired PROD, concern was: small local charity, does not appear to fulfil WP:ORG". c)- Reasons to keep: The article concerns an area of significant interest to the entire state of Colorado both current and historically. The foundation was formed in 1937 and has supported many cultural and civic institutions throughout Colorado. With close to 500 million dollars ($471,530,109.00; 2010 Form 990-PF) in assets and annual grant disbursements close to 20 million dollars ($18,778,434; 2010 Form 990-PF) the "charity" is not exactly small or local.
- The El Pomar foundation administers the "El Pomar Carriage Museum", the Will Rogers Shrine of the Sun, and the "Penrose House" which is used by local, state, national, and international organizations.
The foundation also administers:
- Anna Keesling Ackerman Fund; providing local grants to nonprofit organizations.
- The Hambrick Fund; provides grants to nonprofit organizations throughout Colorado for the "prevention of cruelty to animals, educational programs for the proper care of and attention to animals, and research grants and assistance in these regards".
- Karl E. Eitel Fund; funds various Colorado state "youth at risk" programs.
- I believe the deleted article may be able to be enhanced (or the alternative rewritten) to provide encyclopedic content with current and historical significance. In the future I plan to create an article on co-founder "Julie Penrose" and it will include a section on the foundation.
- Supports
- Central City Opera
- Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center.
- Regional Partnership Program: 9 regional councils that give advice to the trustees. The program provided 1.6 million in grants in 2011.
- Wildland Fire Fund; has provided over 2.7 million in statewide grants to 170 volunteer fire departments.
- Colorado state Boys and Girls clubs.
- Coverage satisfies WP:ORG: There is extensive coverage including: News articles; www.gazette.com- many multiple times, www.chieftain.com, www.bcdemocratonline.com, www.alamosanews.com, www.vaildaily.com, www.canoncitydailyrecord.com, www.lajuntatribunedemocrat.com ). TV coverage (www.kjct8.com/news). Radio; www.kunc.org.(91.5). Ethnic organizations; (www.hispania-news.com (Hispanic), www.nationaljewish.org (Jewish), www.coloradospringsindiancenter.com (Indian). Other organizations; www.foundationcenter.org (Philanthropy news Digest), www.aims.edu (Aims Community College), www.bizjournals.com (Denver Business Journal), www.spacefoundation.org.
- The effects of the El Pomar Foundation has spread to other states; Oregon school forms We R Community adopted from the "El Pomar foundation" in Colorado
- There are many more not listed to satisfy ORG. -Otr500 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Dot-Rotten.jpg
I uploaded the image without first checking the copyright agreement. I have removed its link to the Dot Rotten article and it is now a solitary article/image waiting for deletion. -AlligatorSky (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for letting us know. I have deleted accordingly (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)