Wikipedia:Straw is not a substitute for discussion
This page is intended as humor. It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia policy or guideline. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community. |
Straw is not a substitute for discussion. On Wikipedia, we discuss a lot of things. Sometimes, people are tempted to use straw instead. This is not a good idea, for the following reasons:
- As the little pig learned, it is not a very good building material
- It is very flammable.
- Straw men are a fallacy.
- The primary use of straws is sucking.
So, although being bold is certainly permissible as a substitute for discussion, editors are advised not to use straw for that purpose.