Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/February
Contents
February 27
edit{{California-county-route-stub}} / Category:California County Route stubs / {{California-County-Route-stub}} (redirect)
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not used by any pages. --Rschen7754 07:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - With the merger of the articles into a list, the stub template and category are no longer needed. ---Dough4872 17:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – All articles that would have this stub template have been merged to various lists, making the stub and category unnecessary. --LJ (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
February 18
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly the same use as {{Taiwan-film-director-stub}}. I think any pre-1949 Chinese director stubs should belong to {{China-film-director-stub}}. - iForce= 00:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as our categories primarily seem to use "Taiwan" rather than "Republic of China". Nyttend (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: quite redundant; per Nyttend. Airplaneman talk 05:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
February 4
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Closed. This nomination was never properly completed: this discussion page was created, but was not transcluded to WP:SFD, and no notifications were made for the nomination. --RL0919 (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Request redirect of template to Template:Caecilian-stub and deletion of category. There is no reason to have separate templates—the family Caeciliidae contains o half the caecilians, it is not distinctive, is certainly paraphyletic, and both these stubs have the same image and of course very similar names so many articles are mistagged. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
February 3
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Permcat has been renamed from Category:Filipino films to Category:Philippine films. I think this category should be renamed to Category:Philippine film stubs to match. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to match the permcat. Does this fit WP:CSD#C2 for speedily renaming? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.