Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/March/17
March 17
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was upmerge
Small category, with little prospect of growing much. Suggest upmerging to the family. I'm currently trying to hack the family (Category:Noctuidae stubs) down so that it can allow for upmerging of these small subfamilies. Dawynn (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was upmerge
Undersized, {{latvia-edu-stub}} manages 14 and {{latvia-university-stub}} 7 after sorting. Propose to delete category and upmerge templates. SeveroTC 14:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename of education by country stub categories
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rename/upmerge
The permcats generally are Education in Foo, so I propose we rename the following:
- Category:European education stubs >> Category:Europe education stubs
- Category:Latvian education stubs >> Category:Latvia education stubs (without prejudice of the above deletion nomination)
- Category:Japanese education stubs >> Category:Japan education stubs
The only other ones we have at the moment are Bangladesh, United Kingdom, Mexico, Taiwan and United States. Also see the proposal for a Poland education stubs category. SeveroTC 14:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename of {{Natural phenol and polyphenol-stub}}
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rename/restore/re-sort per nomination
I don't have a suggestion here. But the template name needs some work. Dawynn (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Propose deleting {{Natural phenol and polyphenol-stub}} and Category:Natural phenols and polyphenolic compound stubs, as there is no joined permcat.
- Propose restoring {{polyphenol-stub}} (241 P), and creating Category:Polyphenol stubs for permcat Category:Polyphenols.
- Propose renaming {{natural phenol-stub}} to {{naturalphenol-stub}} (51 P). If 9 more articles can be found, propose creating Category:Natural phenol stubs for permact Category:Natural phenols. If not, upmerge to Category:Aromatic compound stubs.
- Dawynn (talk) 12:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Since Natural phenols are a type of phenol, perhaps {{Natural-phenol-stub}} would make more sense? Other than that, I support your proposal. BTW, it seems we now have a considerable number or renamings and redirects to deal with - the creator of this templa5te didn't read the "DO NOT rename while discussion is in progress" rule above... :( Grutness...wha? 07:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.