April 18

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 02:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Irish county crest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Dead template. Hasn't been used, was created in 2005 probably as an edit test and, after 1 and a half years, is still unfinished. — Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 20:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 02:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox City Tajikistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox City Spain No Flag (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Barangay Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox City South Korea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Danish town (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Serbian City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Czech commune (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox City Belarus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Algerian City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Unused and redundant with {{Infobox Town}} / {{Infobox Settlement}}MJCdetroit 14:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was subst and deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 02:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ASEAN table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template reworked and moved to ASEAN. No more necessary. — Guilherme Paula 15:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 02:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WalesinUK (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template is just a basic copy of Template:UKFormation with one minor difference . — Barryob Vigeur de dessus 10:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete // Pilotguy radar contact 12:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Female Model Bio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can be replaced with {{Infobox Model}}, which is older and has more parameters. Kelvinc 09:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 02:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bg-Talisman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused navigation template; all its links point back to the same article Percy Snoodle 08:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Well, yeah, now that you merged all the info from those separate articles back into the main article. You didn't even discuss the merge. You just proposed it and then did it. Please discuss here. This template will eventually be expanded with the information from the forthcoming 4th edition. — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 02:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ADHS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As with templates that list state highways (many of which have been deleted; can someone link to these deletion discussions?), this is redundant with the link and browse in the infobox. NE2 06:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. You make a valid point, but I think this is more analogous to Interstate and U.S. highways (both of which use templates) than it is to state highways. I'm not particularly happy with the way the browsing is implemented here, and think it would be better served by something like Interstate 87, which browses New York numbered highways in the infobox, and has {{Interstates}} at the bottom. (For example, Corridor X-1 should browse Alabama state routes in the infobox, and have this template at the bottom.) -- NORTH talk 17:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since you asked, here are links to those discussions, but like I said, I don't think they're entirely valid precedent: Oregon, Hawaii, West Virginia, Ohio. (There may be more.) -- NORTH talk 17:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.