January 18

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. нмŵוτнτ 04:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Edit-first-section (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is obsolete, as its functionality is now available as a user preference (see Special:Preferences > Gadgets > User Interface Gadgets). — Sandstein (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you (or others) believe an edit link for section 0 would generally be useful, it seems more useful to turn it on for all users on all pages (probably suggested through bugzilla or WP:VPT), rather than to rely on a page-by-page basis. – Luna Santin (talk) 13:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not so useful if one has to add the template to individual articles, creating clutter and overhead. If at all, this must be implemented as a general default preference, not as a template workaround. Sandstein (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. нмŵוτнτ 04:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Privacy protection (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

It is entirely unnecessary given that the reason field in the generic one can be used to specify "privacy", it is not linked from the list of protection templates. (Page is protected, so I had to place this on it's talk page). VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 10:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete, as these are unused templates which are already starting to snowball. No point in keeping this now-pointless process going. Maxim(talk) 18:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 
Template:Start CoHL SBS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Group of five unused templates meant for season-by-season statistics of ice hockey teams. Templates deprecated by superior Wikitable markup. — Flibirigit (talk) 09:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Start UHL SBS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Start UHL2 SBS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Start UHL2 SBS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Start FlintGenerals AllTimeRecord (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Endorse moves as illustrated by Pompte below. There is no reason to delete non-standard userboxes, and no consensus for that below. Userfying the non-standard userbox is at editorial discretion. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User University of Rochester (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a duplicate of Template:User Rochester, that is only being used by the creator.

I am submitting a move requesting for Template:User Rochester to move to Template:User University of Rochester so that Template:User Rochester, New York can move to Template:User Rochester. Dan LeveilleTALK 05:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's clear what should be done here. To re-iterate what Dan said, in succession:
Template:User University of RochesterTemplate:User University of Rochester2
Template:User RochesterTemplate:User University of Rochester
Delete Template:User Rochester.
Pomte 02:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.