Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 13

< April 12	April 14 >

April 13

Template:Infobox EventID

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox EventID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Event ID resulted in the deletion of all the articles this was transcluded on; this also means that the associated navbox is orphaned and can probably go too. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 23:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WIKIPEDIA IS SO SERIOUS, AND THIS IS A SERIOUS WARNING

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WIKIPEDIA IS SO SERIOUS, AND THIS IS A SERIOUS WARNING (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only contains one image link, which is already well linked (including on my own page). I don't see a purpose for the template if one can just link to the image directly. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:27, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No objection to deletion. MBisanz ^talk 19:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - sound reasoning to me. ^Avicenna_sis @ 08:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox personal name

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox personal name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, not sure if it is of any use. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Making a guess from the user name of the creator, this was presumably intended for use on articles related to Arabic names. How are we covered there with existing templates? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - orphaned. If needed, rename (without redirect) to a more relevant title such as Template:Infobox Arabic name if the infobox was intended for an Arabic name. Airplaneman ✈ 23:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User wprh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close and moved to WP:MFD as this is a userbox Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User wprh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Russian History was merged back into WP:RUSSIA a year or so ago, and hence I don't think there is any purpose to this template? I know it doesn't matter either way if kept or deleted, but not sure what previous cases have decided such as this. Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 14:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Could always redirect to Template:User Russian Project. -- WOSlinker (talk) 18:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As a userbox you might get better input by moving this to MfD. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, although it is not entirely redundant, the inclusion of such notation is better addressed by merging any missing features in {{reg}} or one of the related templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Little used, redundant with {{Registration required}} and {{Subscription required}}. Those templates are better formatted as inline templates using the meta {{fix}}. -— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 12:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While it does duplicate the functionality of {{reg}}, it's worth discussing whether {{reg}} should contain something on WP:PAYWALL. Indeed, there's still a question of whether {{reg}} should be using {{fix}} in the first place, seeing as it's really a flag and not a cleanup template. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd like to note that it duplicates neither {{Registration required}} and {{Subscription required}}, but subsumes both. It goes beyond both in that it applies to sources requiring a single payment for a single article, rather than an ongoing committment implicit in "subscription". Paradoctor (talk) 16:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as its purpose is better served by {{Registration required}} and {{Subscription required}} if a link is added to WP:PAYWALL in {{Subscription required}}. Airplaneman ✈ 23:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mass-Energy transference machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete since it is orphaned and there are no objections Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mass-Energy transference machine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unlikely to see future use. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox prussiakstyles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objections to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox prussiakstyles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Dutchkingstyles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Kingfrenchstyles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox swedenkstyles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox kgstyles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, orphaned templates Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Full House2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objections to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Full House2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Full House3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Full House4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Full House5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Full House6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Full House7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Full House8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sidebar navigation lists with only redlinks and redirects. A complete list of episodes already appears in List of Full House episodes Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Cryptid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Cryptid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be an infobox for a unconfirmed creature. Is there an infobox for Bigfoot? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Infobox fictional creature}} does much the same thing without treating its subject like it exists. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Book cite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Book cite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned and redundant to {{cite book}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteas redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree May have had some kind of useful purpose, but I can't remember why I have created it, actually. Cs32en Talk to me 18:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox BiH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox BiH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned and redundant to {{infobox settlement}} or {{geobox}} or ... Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. ◅ PRODUCER _(TALK) 11:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.