Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 28

April 28

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as superceded by switch statement in {{NJT line ndir}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NJT line ndir/Main (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/22nd Street-Hoboken (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Bergen County (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Gladstone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Hoboken-Tonnelle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Montclair-Boonton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Morristown (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Newark City Subway Broad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/North Jersey Coast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Northeast Corridor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Pascack Valley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/Raritan Valley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line ndir/River LINE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as superceded by switch statement in {{NJT line pdir}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NJT line pdir/Main (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/22nd Street-Hoboken (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/22nd Street–Hoboken (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Bergen County (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Gladstone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Hoboken-Tonnelle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Montclair-Boonton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Morristown (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Newark City Subway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Newark City Subway Broad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Northeast Corridor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Pascack Valley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/Raritan Valley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NJT line pdir/River LINE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Info 66 0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Info 66 4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Info 66 5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Info 66 6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Info 66 7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Info 66 9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:British Rail Diesel Loco/Preserved 20 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned templates, which are largely redundant to the information already appearing in the infobox in British Rail Class 66. Any useful additional information should be merged there. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. The first six are redundant as stated by the nom. They were presumably intended for use if the subclasses of British Rail Class 66 were ever given individual articles, but this seems unlikely and templates wouldn't really be necessary anyway. The seventh is somewhat different, but appears to be a copy of a list already found in British Rail Class 20 which would only ever be used on that page. Alzarian16 (talk) 02:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. The consensus of the discussion is that Quebec English is a regional variant of Canadian English that does not differ in many ways that would be significant for writing encyclopedia articles. Note: After deleting the template I intend to recreate the page as a redirect to Template:Canadian English, so the link will still be blue. RL0919 (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quebec English (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete: This template is redundant there is already a template for this. It is at Template:Canadian English . Having a template for each reigon of Canada is redundant and unnessisary. There are not seperate templates for reigons of the United States, and even though there are different dialects in the United States the template Template:American English is enough. Alpha Quadrant (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS3-2afb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and broken— calls non-existant {{Prettytable-BS}} (although that is probably just a prettytable template on another wiki) -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:23, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this was the predecessor of the overlay possibility now introduced into {{BS3}} ... axpdeHello! 19:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS2-2afb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

(deletion request missing here ... difflink 1, difflink 2)

I guess this was the predecessor of the overlay possibility now introduced into {{BS2}} ... axpdeHello! 19:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS-2afb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and broken— calls non-existant {{Prettytable-BS}} -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this was the predecessor of the overlay possibility now introduced into {{BS}} ... axpdeHello! 19:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Divisor classes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

(Virtually) unused, deprecated. —Justin (koavf)TCM03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medical disclaimer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Against the guideline WP:NDA, not really used, and lacks categories. SaMi 13:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.