Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 21

The White Pass Route
The White Pass Route
	<img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/33/WhitePassonCurve.jpg/200px-WhitePassonCurve.jpg" decoding="async" width="200" height="133" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="750" data-file-height="500"> White Pass steam locomotive rounds a curve, with dramatic scenery reflected in the windows.
Locale	Alaska, northern British Columbia, Yukon Territory
Commercial operations
Original gauge	36
Preserved operations
Preserved gauge	36
Commercial history
Opened	August 1, 1900
Closed	1982
1988	Reopened as The White Pass Route

White Pass and Yukon Route
	File:WhitePassYukonRailroadMap.JPG
Overview
Headquarters	Skagway, Alaska
Reporting mark	WPY
Locale	Alaska, northern British Columbia, Yukon Territory
Dates of operation	1898–1982, 1988–present
Technical
Track gauge	36

< December 20	December 22 >

December 21

Template:User netscape

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. The deletion was moved to Mfd (non-admin closre). JJ98 (Talk) 01:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User netscape (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template, links into to 2 pages. This was created by Pickbothmanlol who was been blocked indefinitely as a sock-master. JJ98 (Talk) 10:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes should be nominated at MfD rather than here (see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Header#What_not_to_propose_for_discussion_here). Mhiji (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've agree, it should be moved to MFD. JJ98 (Talk) 21:42, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greek Idol)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Greek Idol) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:Greek Idol. EmanWilm (talk) 02:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:T3. Mhiji (talk) 02:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Mhiji. Reh man 02:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:White Pass and Yukon Route

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:White Pass and Yukon Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is a more up to date version of the same template coded within the article White Pass and Yukon Route. This appears to be a work in progress that has been abandoned. It hasn't had any substantive work done on it since 2009-05-28. Colonies Chris (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can not find that more up to date version. Why not just attempt to find and add the missing info? Peter Horn User talk 04:12, 24 December 2010 (UTC)>[reply]

Nothing is missing. The code to display the route is within the White Pass and Yukon Route article, beginning at the heading {| {{Railway line header}}. It's clearly an improved version of the template - that's why the template (which is not used anywhere) is now superfluous and I'm nominating it for deletion. Colonies Chris (talk) 17:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Keep the latter but transfer info and map. Peter Horn User talk 04:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sister Cities of Delhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. Ruslik_Zero 20:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sister Cities of Delhi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Sister Cities of Islamabad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Sister Cities of Lahore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Moncton Sister Cities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Sister Cities of Mirpur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We already have sections like Delhi#Sister_cities_and_twin_regions, Islamabad#Sister_cities, etc. in each article.134.253.26.6 (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I orphaned the Moncton one by replacing it with an equivalent Template:sister cities. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Stage1pokémon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by User:RHaworth

Template:Stage1pokémon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

orphaned. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as useless. I think it's supposed to be a list of the first evolution of each Pokémon, but Pokémon aren't grouped together this way, so there isn't really anywhere this can be used. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 22:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Global cite b

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 19:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Global cite b (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and apparently non-working template. CharlesGillingham (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) CharlesGillingham (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused and unknown purpose. I'm not sure what this is supposed to do. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 22:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment it's a matched pair with {{Global cite a}}; this is a table close template, these used to be very common on Wikipedia before ParserFunctions were implemented. 65.95.13.158 (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is not functioning properly, whatever its intent was. 65.95.13.158 (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.