Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 1

< January 31	February 2 >

February 1

Template:NatOrganicBox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NatOrganicBox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:NatOrganicBox footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, deprecated. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redundant and only used in two very old (2005) user sandboxes. --RL0919 (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Article summary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article summary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused and unnecessary. --RL0919 (talk) 19:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sample box start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 22:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sample box start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Should probably consider these TfDs as a group:
1. Sample box start
2. Sound sample box align right
3. Sound sample box align left
4. Sound sample box align left
5. Sample box end
  ... and add these two:
6. Template:Sample box start variation 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
7. Template:Sample box start variation 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) — John Cardinal (talk) 02:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ADB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was No consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ADB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused template —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a template at all. It is a template disambiguation page. Hesperian 03:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response Then it should be added to Category:Disambiguation_and_redirection_templates and taken out of the deprecated templates categories. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Did you take the time look at the template or just nominate everything in that category: Gnan garra 08:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

I'm quite happy to restore it to its original version[1] and usage, but after much discussion and some dubious end run attempts without the discussion this became a disambiguation template. Gnan garra 08:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be a disambiguation page. Orderinchaos 04:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Navimg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navimg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, heavily deprecated to the new link= feature by developer Raymond. By deleting the template, we assure that this syntax is also used. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Department Heaven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Department Heaven (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Articles are well linked to each other. Magioladitis (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is that someone with the knowledge will go through and add information (pages) that aren't there, such as developers and other stuff. Also with new games coming... But I don't feel strongly enough about this to defend it any further. DrSturm (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:All-Ireland Minor Hurling Teams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 12:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:All-Ireland Minor Hurling Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:All-Ireland U-21 Hurling Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned meta-navigation templates which could does not appear to be needed as one could just transclude the individual subtemplates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, redundant, and apparently not being maintained (most recent info on one is for a 2008 squad, the other is 2006 and earlier). --RL0919 (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:All-Ireland Senior Hurling Teams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 12:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:All-Ireland Senior Hurling Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Massive navigation template with no transclusions. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Incorporates a bunch of more specific navboxes into one template, when it will typically be more appropriate to selectively include just the specific navboxes that are relevant to a given article. --RL0919 (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Album tracks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Album tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and lacking in apparent usefulness. --RL0919 (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ahlalbayt2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ahlalbayt2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. From the name, it appears to be a Sunni version of {{Ahlalbayt}}. However, from the content it appears to be largely redundant to {{WivesMuhammad}}. In any event, it's currently orphaned. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as it's orphaned. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 ECOL football standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 ECOL football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template with no clear parent article. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 03:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1980s NBA Finals broadcasters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1980s NBA Finals broadcasters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, appears to be largely redundant to content already found in List of NBA Finals broadcasters. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 03:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

UAE squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United Arab Emirates squad – 2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United Arab Emirates U20 squad – AFC U-19 Championship 2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United Arab Emirates squad – 2003 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United Arab Emirates Squad 2007 Gulf Cup of Nations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United Arab Emirates Squad 2009 Gulf Cup of Nations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As discussed before, no template is allowed for non-notable event except top regional event (AFC Cup, UEFA Euro, Copa America, etc), FIFA World Cup and Olympic. Display honor can have different template and squad list is enough to show the squad member of the event. Matthew_hk t c 21:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 03:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and prior concensus. Jogurney (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SE Eivissa-Ibiza squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SE Eivissa-Ibiza squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The team falls to regional league level and no reliable source for the current squad and may be full of non-professional player. Matthew_hk t c 21:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 03:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - navbox is totally unnecessary for a bunch of non-notable athletes and we don't want the redlinks to encourage editors to start articles about non-notable athletes. Jogurney (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Streets in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Relisted at today's TfD page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Streets in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nearly all of the streets listed have been merged to Phoenix metropolitan area arterial roads. The two not merged, Central Avenue Corridor and Grand Avenue, are also described and linked to from that page. In addition, Grand Avenue is currently subject of a proposed merger to U.S. Route 60 in Arizona. See Talk:Baseline Road (Arizona) for background. Cnilep (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blue Mountains line black

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blue Mountains line black (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It seems like it's just a few words with bold text and a black font. Nothing that can't be achieved with less coding and without a template. Pointless and orphaned, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - links in articles should be blue, and things in black should be anything but links. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AUS fb St Kilda Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AUS fb St Kilda Football Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned and redundant to the currently used {{St Kilda Football Club}} and {{St Kilda Football Club Seasons}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Orphaned, and redundant. I think (in this case, at least) having the two templates is more versatile, as they could (theoretically) be used independently of each other, when the context of the article is only relevant to one of them, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 15:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest preview software release/FireIRC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was 'Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview software release/FireIRC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was erroneously listed at AfD here with the rationale, Not used anymore due to the article and its associated entries in the IRC Comparison were removed. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. (Commented earlier when this was listed on AFD as well) JBsupreme (talk) 06:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gotcha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Tbsdy lives per T2 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gotcha (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template does not seem like it should belong in the template namespace and rather the user namespace. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 05:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above and along with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Gotcha. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Jack and the nominator. --MZMcBride (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Tasteless joke. Annoying simulation of the MediaWiki's UI. Violating WP:SMI. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 10:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Economy of India infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Economy of India infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Templated infobox that is only used on one article Economy of India, and all refs are displayed on the article page (contrary to note left on template page) so no major benefit to splitting this infobox out from the article it is used on. Infobox material should be merged into article and this template deleted. Optigan13 (talk) 01:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & Delete. I agree with Optigan's solution, since this is the standard practice for all infoboxes used on a single article and this is preventing the refs not to show, which deems it pretty useless. --Pamri • Talk 03:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route SIS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SIS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items now redirect to California County Routes in zone A. Rs chen 7754 00:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now useless. ---Dough 48 72 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No longer useful due to page merges. --LJ (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route TEH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route TEH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items now redirect to California County Routes in zone A. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now useless. ---Dough 48 72 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No longer useful due to page merges. --LJ (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route LAS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route LAS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items now redirect to California County Routes in zone A. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now useless. ---Dough 48 72 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No longer useful due to page merges. --LJ (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route SHA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SHA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items now redirect to California County Routes in zone A. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now useless. ---Dough 48 72 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No longer useful due to page merges. --LJ (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route PLU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route PLU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items now redirect to California County Routes in zone A. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now useless. ---Dough 48 72 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No longer useful due to page merges. --LJ (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route SIE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SIE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items now redirect to California County Routes in zone A. Rs chen 7754 00:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now useless. ---Dough 48 72 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No longer useful due to page merges. --LJ (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless. Samwb123^{Please read} 04:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.