Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 17

June 17

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NSW Islamic Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not a useful navigation template. Only two of the articles in the navigation exists. And even if they all existed, it isn't that likely a reader would "really want to go from A to B" as per WP:NAV. Note that List of Islamic schools in New South Wales exists and can easily be added as a "see also" in the article without adding template clutter. Whpq (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Province of Ecuador (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant infobox to Template:Infobox province (infobox settlement). Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Department of Paraguay (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Infobox department Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Department of Colombia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Infobox department Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{url}}. Ruslik_Zero 19:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:URL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template doesn't seem to have any real use and isn't used an any articles. It is currently only used in a user's sandbox, and another template, which I placed for deletion below. Deleting this template would open up the opportunity for it to be used to redirect to Template:Url, or even to have that page move to this name. Sorafune 16:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I'd propose to keep it and redirect it to Template:Url or Template:Bare URLs. For reference sections which need ref filling. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox French department (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant infobox to {{Infobox department}}. Could easily be merged. I propose that if not the parameters are simply added and we merge it. Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed new parameters for infobox settlement (department) to facilitate this. Parameters such as arrondissements: and communes etc would also be needed on many African regional places and make it more universal. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Youtuber (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No article of any YouTuber actually uses this template. A similar but more organized template existed at Template:Infobox internet celebrity but was deleted, and now all YouTube celebrities use Template:Infobox person along with the sub-template Template:Infobox person/Internet info. Also, if this template is deleted, the redirect Template:Youtuber should be deleted as well. Sorafune +1 04:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a poorly formatted Userbox? The naming convention seems to suggest it is. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RL0919 thought so too, but this actually looks like it was intended to be an infobox. An infobox for the use of the author on the article he wrote about himself. Safe to say that this is redundant to {{infobox internet celebrity}} (which has already been itself merged to {{infobox person}}). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:55, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.