Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 May 14

< May 13	May 15 >

May 14

Template:Infobox Armenia province

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. delldot ∇. 03:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Armenia province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to standard place infoboxes like {{Infobox settlement}} and lacks key features, like a skyline image, coat of arms, coordinates, ... It was only being used in about 10 articles (same as the number of provinces of Armenia), so I replaced them with the standard. I am happy to revert these edits if a better alternative is agreed upon. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. No need to revert. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:29, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete Yet another specialized settlement template. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 22:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infrog welcome2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infrog welcome2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Very sparsely used template from 2004, unnecessarily specific, and I don't see that it needs to be kept. At best, change all occurences to {{Welcome}}. Rodhull andemu 18:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete We deleted something very similar just a few weeks ago. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 22:39, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pakistan ties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, no objections. delldot ∇. 04:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pakistan ties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template Template:Foreign relations of Pakistan already exists and this can certainly be merged there (if it isn't already duplicated) instead of adding countless template tags to the Foreign relations of Pakistan page. Lihaas (talk) 13:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Family Military

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. delldot ∇. 03:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Family Military (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a fork of {{Infobox military person}} used in only one article. The only difference that I can see is that this one allows (non-notable) family members to be wedged into the infobox. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; the only way a template with this name should work would be if it were the family business to be war (like hereditary men-at-arms; ie. knightly families) 70.29.208.247 (talk) 04:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If fields are needed for parents, siblings, and children, then they should be added to {{Infobox military person}}. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 23:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Wikipedian Red Cross Barnstar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Wikipedian Red Cross Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The barnstar violates the American Red Cross trademark and rights granted under the Geneva Conventions. Please see 36 U.S.C. § 300106 Jc3s5h (talk) 04:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC) revised 4:24 UTC[reply]

delete per nom. BTW: The trademark is shared with Johnson & Johnson, but they can only use it on first aid material. No objection to recreating this with a green cross or the like , but the name has to change. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 22:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Charmed cast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Charmed cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An inappropriate navigation template; actor bios should be about the person and not a specific role. See the deleted {{Smallville Cast}} discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 August 4#Template:Smallville Cast. Jack Merridew 03:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is nothing on this that can't be found on the article about the television program in the cast section. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this was a newbie contribution... I edited those articles for nearly a year and this had no uses. // FrankB 15:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ghana Squad 2009 African Youth Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ghana Squad 2009 African Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As discussed before in Wikiproject:football, it is a miss-use of the template. Matthew_hk t c 00:29, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:FOOTY has reached concensus that these navboxes are not appropriate for youth tournaments such as this one. Jogurney (talk) 01:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sublime with Rome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. I think 'for obvious reasons' is not a useful rationale so I'm giving that opinion less weight. However, the consensus is still to delete even with that input.delldot ∇. 04:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sublime with Rome (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unnecessary for a band that's only claim to fame is that two member used to be in Sublime. The template is unnecessary and excessive, and only really points to the band members, linked otherwise in the article itself, and another unnecessary page (Sublime with Rome Tour), which I believe will be deleted eventually. Not every article, and not every band deserves a band template. Thus, I say Delete. TuckerResearch (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for obvious reasons. Alex (talk) 00:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the nominators rationale is clear, in that there aren't enough links to justify a navigation box. I don't see any "obvious reasons" for keeping it. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:52, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough links for a navbox. Sublime with Rome is marginal at best, with most of the article about the name and lawsuit. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 00:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.