Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 8

April 8

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G7. Magioladitis (talk) 10:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Beast of the Week (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not actually a template, used only on one user page AussieLegend (talk) 18:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was a template I created for my page. Would it help if I renamed it "Template:Pinguinus Beast of the Week"? Pinguinus (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it's only used on your page, why isn't it in your userspace? --AussieLegend (talk) 19:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I will move it there.Pinguinus (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prehistoric Mammals intro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a template and not used AussieLegend (talk) 17:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is for a new portal. It is still under construction. Please do not delete it. Pinguinus (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A portal to a project with apparently only one member? --AussieLegend (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All portals start off this way. It can hardly begin with a long list of members.Pinguinus (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you be sure that other editors are interested in joining the project. In any case, this page is not a template. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Decently written, but definitely doesn't belong in the template namespace. If ever in the future there may be a need for this information to be transcluded, I'd recommend creating a subpage of the portal. Still, I'd hold off on doing that anytime soon, and only if the project attracts additional membership. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to portalspace This should be called Portal:Prehistoric mammals/Intro like how other portals work. (Portal:Mammals/Intro for instance) 65.93.12.101 (talk) 07:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete What a waste of space, The topic is already covered by WikiProject Mammals, This is clearly one user who has an ill-considered idea then acted on it without asking for any input, no projects notified. I will be requesting the project be deleted along with the portal. We barely have enough members to keep WikiProject Mammals active let alone creating sub-projects that will fail and just waste server space. ZooPro 14:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D18o (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I don't know what was this supposed to be. Magioladitis (talk) 08:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have used this template when writing articles involving isotopic concentrations. It made my life much easier. It is often subst'd. See δ18O. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 14:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Template is usually substed, and refers to δ18O, an isotopic concentration ratio. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D15n (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I don't what was this supposed to be. Magioladitis (talk) 08:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have used this template when writing articles involving isotopic concentrations. It made my life much easier. It is often subst'd. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 14:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Template is usually substed, and refers to δ15N, an isotopic concentration ratio. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please add some documentation to the template? -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.