Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 16

< December 15	December 17 >

December 16

Template:OneLegResultFb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OneLegResultFb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NBA team statistics legend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBA team statistics legend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NBA labeled map 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete

Template:NBA labeled map 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map Bulwersator (talk) 23:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't even remember why I created this.—Chris!_c/t 23:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NBA Playoff Bracket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBA Playoff Bracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Yet another unused bracket template. Bulwersator (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NASCAR race tracks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NASCAR race tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 23:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Each series has a navbox for tracks, such as NASCAR Sprint Cup Series racetracks, NASCAR Nationwide Series racetracks, NASCAR Truck Series racetracks and NASCAR Corona Series racetracks. -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 21:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NAFL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NAFL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox Bulwersator (talk) 23:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mythical Creatures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mythical Creatures (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Attempted duplication of Category:Legendary creatures in navbox. Bulwersator (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Myst heritage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Myst heritage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 23:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It goes into excessive detail, and really isn't explained that well within the template. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 00:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it looks like it is for Myst (series), (once called the most popular computer game ever...). 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Myanmar Union Government

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Myanmar Union Government (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 23:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Musical instruments by type

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Musical instruments by type (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 23:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – too big to ever be used. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Music scenes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Music scenes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 23:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Muralicode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Muralicode (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 23:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Olin Edirne Basket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Olin Edirne Basket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Orphaned with only red links. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this may be "speedy-able" under {{db-t3}} as a substantial duplication of {{Euroleague roster header}} as used on Olin Edirne Basket. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Florida State Seminoles roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Florida State Seminoles roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be the 2011 Florida State Seminoles football roster. That information only need to be presented in one place on Wikipedia, at 2011 Florida State Seminoles football team. There is another version of the roster table hard-coded there. This template should not exist. Jweiss11 (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not need to exist as a separate page in template space; the text and graphics should be directly incorporated into the "2011 Florida State Seminoles football team" article. We seem to encounter this kind of problem frequently in the sports projects—perhaps we need to train our wikiproject editors better. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:09, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2011 D.C. United schedule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2011 D.C. United schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is adequately covered by 2011 D.C. United season. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 11:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:3-space symmetry groups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:3-space symmetry groups (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

"This list is comparable to the 2-space groups, but very incomplete!" + typical "Unused, purpose unclear" Bulwersator (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete. I have been trying to list symmetry groups in Coxeter notation, including existing articles List of spherical symmetry groups and List of planar symmetry groups. This template is for the 3-dimensional space groups, along with another of 4-dimensional spherical symmetry groups, Template:3-sphere_symmetry_groups. I'm waiting on some sources, but I admit I probably won't be able to build the cross-referencing table I'm looking for from known sources for the space groups. I can move the template to a user page subpage if you'd like. Having them in a template is useful when I'm cross-referencing different tables on one page. Tom Ruen (talk) 07:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem in waiting month or two - but it may be better to start template in usespace and move finished to template namespace. Bulwersator (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:8Col15PollTable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:8Col15PollTable (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 05:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the documentation was on the talk page. Still no idea of the utility of it... 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Template was used in 2001 NCAA Division I-A football rankings, but mistakenly removed in this edit. Not sure what that editor was thinking, but it's all cleaned up now and being utilized again. Thanks for bringing the proposed deletion to my attention. DeFaultRyan 17:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not sure whatever it is better than standard table - but now it is used. Bulwersator (talk) 21:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:911ct/Supporters/Politicians and Officials

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:911ct/Supporters/Politicians and Officials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:911ct/Supporters/Political activists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:911ct/Supporters/Scholars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused subtemplate without clear purpose. Bulwersator (talk) 05:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Creator.) I agree with the deletion request, as these templates have been unused and unmaintained for a considerable time now. Cs32en Talk to me 14:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ACR lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ACR lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 05:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008RLWC map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008RLWC map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map. Bulwersator (talk) 04:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Now used. The template on 2008 Rugby League World Cup was broken. Mattlore (talk) 05:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK Bulwersator (talk) 08:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:El Camino College Athletic Hall of Fame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:54, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:El Camino College Athletic Hall of Fame (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox is for a junior college athletics hall of fame that doesn't even have its own article. Most of the people listed in the navbox don't seem to have articles about them either. Doesn't seem to be much if any third party coverage of this hall of fame either. I think we can do without this one. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The fact that the topic of the template is not likely notable to have its own article is reason enough. Every college (even a lot of high schools) have Halls of Fame. An article or section of a larger article (especially for small schools like junior colleges) is more than sufficient along with the alumni categories. --JonRidinger (talk) 04:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This navbox clearly violates at least three of the four navbox guidelines:

1. All articles within a template relate to a single, coherent subject. Yes.

2. The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article. No.

3. The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent. No.

4. There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template. No.

The article also violates another basic tenet of not utilizing significant amounts of unlinked text. By my quick count, there are something like 200 members of this Hall of Fame listed in the navbox. Eleven of the 200+ listed HOF members are actually linked to existing Wikipedia articles. This navbox does not even begin to satisfy this restriction.

Even more damning is the fact that the navbox's subject HOF probably fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS. In the case of sports HOFs, there is no presumption of notability, and it appears this one is probably not notable by any reasonable measure, including the underlying notability of the HOF's individual members. Delete, and move on. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Dirtlawyer laid it out plain and simple. I had thought "Kill the template; keep the content", but he clearly explains why that should be avoided Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 06:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dirtlawyer, can't really extrapolate on that much more. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Popular support to EU integration of Ukraine in Ukraine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after moving to Ukraine–European Union relations#Popular support to EU integration of Ukraine in Ukraine. If there is desire to have the table in template form, for use in more than one article, the contents can be found there. As of today, the template is unused. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This looks more like a section of an article then a proper template. Night of the Big Wind _talk 02:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but change Must admit that the "written info" in the Template is a but strange; but the table in the Template could be used in multiple articles. I have no problem too "copy-and-past" the "written info" out of the Template so we can keep the table. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to an article. The template is not a real template - it is an article, or section from an article.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: also fine with me. Will somebody move the content of this template to Ukraine–European Union relations#Popular support to EU integration of Ukraine in Ukraine before this/if this template gets deleted please. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Toddy1 (talk) 22:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but change. This indeed could be useful for many politics and foreign relations articles which we count in dozens I guess. The idea of templating the issue is unusual but viable. Ukrained (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.