Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 3

< December 2	December 4 >

December 3

Template:Unknown To No One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unknown To No One (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template consists entirely of red links, and there is only one transclusion. (The template was created on September 21, 2010; no new articles have been created as a result of these red links.) Therefore this template should be deleted. Senator2029║talk 15:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not needed at this time. Robofish (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mapply

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mapply (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Macomp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Arcosh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Itunit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This doesn't appear to do anything, has no documentation, and appears to be a orphan. –Temporal User (Talk) 12:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added several more unused and non-functional math templates. — Edokter (talk) — 14:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian political parties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian political parties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Speedy delete under WP:CFD#T3. I don't know why this has to be discussed, but the speedy tag has been removed by two editors now. The Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 14#Template:Canadian political parties discussion determined that the several local navboxes shall not be merged into one this large one. Thus leaving it orphaned, and unusable, as using it would be in violation of the aforementioned decision. I also want to mention that I said this template should be deleted in the previous discussion, but the closing admin did not address it. 117Avenue (talk) 03:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose speedy delete. Keep. Perfectly good navigiational aid, not discussed in the reference tfm. Me-123567-Me (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So use the 12 local navboxes. That way when a change needs to be made, only one edit has to be made. (Example) 117Avenue (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could see doing that. Me-123567-Me (talk) 05:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insanely large templates basically spam irrelevant links to, in this case, about a hundred articles. The decision not to "merge" all of the provincial templates - which ensure the high value links are the ones added - established that there is no purpose to this large omnibus one. Consequently, this one lacks purpose, and will remain an orphan. Reso lute 03:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and make it speedy, as being against the previous concensus. To repeat: The individual templates are all that is required. There is no need to add a large overloaded template for subjects which are only peripherally connected. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EMiami Marlins current roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect. No need to delete, changing into a redirect will do. WOSlinker (talk) 08:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EMiami Marlins current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded duplication of Template:Miami Marlins roster navbox —Bagumba (talk) 02:24, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete There should be a CSD category for this. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under WP:CFD#T3. 117Avenue (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.