Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 13

September 13

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SectionSource (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, after replacement. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox iPhone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Don't see why separate template is necessary for a small family of phones when the perfectly good {{Infobox mobile phone}} is available. Biker Biker (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This comparison might help to decide:

Differing variable names in Yellow. Hippo99 (talk) 03:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the comparison above indicates, a merge here is trivial. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.