Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 17

< September 16	September 18 >

September 17

Template:WhatYaDoing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to User:WhatYaDoing/characters Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:WhatYaDoing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with no usefulness. These are not characters in any work of fiction, but rather a list of articles that WhatYaDoing (talk · contribs) has worked on. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

If WhatYaDoing wants to have a navbox of all the stuff he's worked on he's entitled to, but it should be moved to his userspace. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

• Userfy per thumperward. —Quiddity (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Class box Oliver Hazard Perry frigate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Class box Oliver Hazard Perry frigate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Plain text that can be substituted into the articles. Unlikely that the ship will stay the same in their entire lifespan, so misleading too. The Banner _talk 07:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

• ummmm, bigger problem. There are 112 templates like this that are all only used in that single list article, List of naval ship classes in service. Half of them were created by Kazec back in 2006, and the rest by assorted usernames. (Those notes are rough, from a few spot checks and extrapolation). Can we just subst: them all, and delete enmasse? It's hard to watchlist content, when it's all transcluded... —Quiddity (talk) 17:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
  • That's definitely the correct call. The article then needs completely rewritten as a proper list rather than as a dump of over a hundred antediluvian infobox clones. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Ok, I've boldly cleaned up that mess. [I subst'd all the "Class box ..." templates and a few instances of {{Ship class list}}, placed the class names after semicolons instead of subheaders, fixed most of the indents, and removed the custom box outlines]. List of naval ship classes in service should be acceptable now? Hopefully that all went ok. Trout me if I missed/messed anything badly.

If no one screams in horror, in the next few days, i'd recommend deleting all the now unused "Class box ..." templates (112 linked above), and the {{Ship class list}} template. —Quiddity (talk) 22:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

I agree in principle to replacing the templates but as a matter of courtesy you should inform the ships project of the plan. Brad (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

I've pinged them now. —Quiddity (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely superb work. This is good to go IMO. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.