Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 2

< September 1	September 3 >

September 2

Template:Josh Thompson (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn, I'm full of crap, I found reviews of the other 2 singles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Josh Thompson (singer) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Navigates only 3 articles, and I don't see article potential for the other 2 songs. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BS-KRZ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS-KRZ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's only unused because I forgot about it. Useddenim (talk) 22:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

are you planning to actually use it (still unused 6 days later)? Frietjes (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but there's a glitch in it that prevents me from using it the way I'd like to. Specifically, although it displays the compound image correctly when used alone, it doesn't work properly inside a BS row template. Any idea how to fix it? Useddenim (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Former barangays of Cabuyao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Former barangays of Cabuyao (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless, only links to neighboring municipalities. More than adequately covered in parent article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Districts of Cabuyao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Districts of Cabuyao (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:City of Cabuyao (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Districts of Cabuyao with Template:City of Cabuyao.
5 short links can easily be incorporated into {{City of Cabuyao}}, which needs a thorough clean-up as well. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as proposed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Titanic last survivors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Titanic last survivors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The contents of this template is duplicate of what already exists in Passengers of the RMS Titanic#Last survivors. No need to have both and the template in each survivor's article can easily be replaced with a link to the aforementioned passenger article. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: this is what we have navboxes for. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.