Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 31

May 31

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spitfire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails WP:NENAN with only three relevant links The Banner talk 22:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LogoCon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed as a template, should be simply substituted and deleted (or move to a subpage of the corresponding project). Frietjes (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 8Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 8Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hail the Villain (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails WP:NENAN The Banner talk 14:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I went in and was going to make an attempt to save some of these, but I just can't stomach doing it. The articles linked to from this are barely notable in my opinion and I think that some of them would qualify for deletion at AfD or at very least merging... Since I am certain that Jax 0677 is reading these even though he is prohibited from participating in the discussion, I'm going to say this; you have six months that you can't touch or talk about these templates, I would suggest spending that time improving the actual articles that these navboxes are suppose to service and perhaps trying to turn some more of what should have been redlinks in these templates (redlinks are actually good) into blue links so that there will be plenty of pages to link to when the ban is over. Technical 13 (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Few articles linked to, and the articles linked to should arguably be at AfD. FurrySings (talk) 17:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, to few core links. Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This one's pretty much pointless per comments above. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is a spectacularly inappropriate navbox. The only directly-relevant link is the album Take Back the Fear, and I have just PRODded that. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stars Go Dim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails WP:NENAN The Banner talk 14:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Addison Road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails WP:NENAN The Banner talk 14:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Exhorder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Even with added links, this article fails WP:NENAN. Count demos towards "five relevant links"? The Banner talk 13:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.