Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 23
| < October 22 | October 24 > |
|---|
October 23
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused as releated article just uses a normal table to list the episodes. WOSlinker (talk) 19:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete, redundant to {{episode list}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused as releated article just uses a normal table to list the episodes. WOSlinker (talk) 19:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete, redundant to {{episode list}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
It's a routine county navbox, except for its subject: this template covers only places that existed within a long-defunct entity. There's no need for one of these templates for a defunct entity, because the articles can be added to whichever current county navbox is applicable. Meanwhile, note that the template's only used on the defunct county's article, because we have no articles on anything else that the template links. What's the point of a navbox that doesn't link to any extant articles, especially when those articles could be added to regular navboxes? Nyttend (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 22:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Qing namebox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 22:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.