Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 22
September 22
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per this and numerous related discussions concerning religious group infoboxes. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox Mormons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single use, should be subst'ed and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. The reason it's in a template is because it's a large infobox, and having a huge wall of code at the top of the article is not only messy but is a turn off for new users, and makes it really easy for them to accidentally break stuff. Substituting this would not be an improvement for the article and if I understand things correctly, wouldn't help anything with Wikipedia's servers either (assuming it's being deleted to save space). If there's some weird policy out there saying a template has to be in one or more article, I can easily find another article to transclude this on. ~Adjwilley (talk) 03:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is just 2.6kb, it's hardly huge.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete after merging with the article. someone should have a look at Template:Infobox Jainism and Template:Infobox Jews, which appear to be the only other ethnic and religious group infoboxes not merged with the respective articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. The infobox is no longer single-use. It has been added to the following other articles about Mormons: Cultural Mormon, Molly Mormon, Less-active Mormon and Jack Mormon. COGDEN 02:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete and remove it from the other pages it's been added to. — Lfdder (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Single use, should be subst'ed and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Replace with {{Infobox Criminal organization}} ; it should not be substed, as it uses {{infobox}} directly, which should not be called from an article directly. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. . LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment this is a substitution template, it's supposed to be unused. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Can be replaced by Template:Infobox deity. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It should most definitely not be substituted, it's an infobox template using {{infobox}} so should never be placed directly in an article. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am guessing here 'substituted' has a meaning other than 'replaced'. Is that right? My meaning here and below is 'replace'. LT90001 (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- On MediaWiki wikis, "substitution" in relation with templates has a definite meaning, and it is not "replace" in the way you're meaning it. It means use the "subst:" function, a built-in function on MediaWiki wikis that works on templates. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for your reply. LT90001 (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- You can read more about substitution on WP:SUBSTITUTION.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for your reply. LT90001 (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- On MediaWiki wikis, "substitution" in relation with templates has a definite meaning, and it is not "replace" in the way you're meaning it. It means use the "subst:" function, a built-in function on MediaWiki wikis that works on templates. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am guessing here 'substituted' has a meaning other than 'replaced'. Is that right? My meaning here and below is 'replace'. LT90001 (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It should most definitely not be substituted, it's an infobox template using {{infobox}} so should never be placed directly in an article. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Replace per nom -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- redirect to {{infobox deity}}, no unique parameters in this template. Frietjes (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Template:USG-Infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single use, should be subst'ed and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It should most definitely note be substituted, {{infobox}} should never be directly called from an article. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Unsubst and replace with {{infobox organization}}; remove the direct use of {{infobox}} from Undergraduate Student Government at Stony Brook University -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, simple frontend for Template:Infobox basketball club. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Template:USBL team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Could be replaced by Template:Infobox basketball club. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Template:WIGS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single use, should be subst'ed and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused, if necessary Template:Infobox court case could be used instead. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It should most definitely not be susbtituted, {{infobox}} should never be called directly from an article, especially as we have a generic template to use, {{Infobox court case}} -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Yama-Niyama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Used only on Ananda Marga, should be substituted and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable to me. There's no wider use for this, it's just content for one article (might not even need substing, as it provides links that are already in the prose) bobrayner (talk) 23:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Could be merged with Template:Infobox sports tournament. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It should most definitely not be susbtituted. This calls {{infobox}} directly, so should never be placed directly into articles.
- Recode using {{Infobox sports tournament}} and then either keep or replace (subst) the new version that uses template:Infobox sports tournament -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Could be merged with Template:Infobox college golf team, one transclusion. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- This should never be substituted, it is an implementation through {{infobox}} which should not be called from an article directly. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect college usually equals university, so the synonymous title should exist -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Single use and purely decorative, could be either substed and deleted or just deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Item (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a game guide. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment the articles that used this infobox were deleted wholesale recently. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Single use, 1,624 bytes. Should be substituted and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Subst and delete and cleanup after substing, the infobox should be removed and concverted to a table, as {{infobox}} should not be directly used in an article, for what is in essence a two element table (imagemap and caption) -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not usefulLT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete seems particularly useless, being just a country name and a flag, as an infobox -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
KeepThis template I had to make for Unsuccessful Eurovision Song Contest applicants and is still used there! How would you resolve the problem? I don't think you may use Template:Infobox Eurovision country there. Because it are countries that where not yet on Eurovision, but are trying to! That's why I made the infobox to have a simular color and style with the eurovision template.
Klodde (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It really is unused in mainspace, check this link.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- I created the template, so I got the message it's on the deletion list, but you're right, it's no used any more, I discoverd that someone replaced the templates on Unsuccessful Eurovision Song Contest applicants by another one, so, you may Delete Klodde (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- It really is unused in mainspace, check this link.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete ;), see above Klodde (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Single use, it can be replaced with a simple table. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete, no arguments from the author. It was originally created for this purpose, but the corresponding data was deemed to be out-of-date, and subsequently removed. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
It has been superseded by another template since 2009. Does it need to be kept for its edit history / attribution? If not, it can be deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It should most definitely not be substituted, {{infobox}} should not be called from the articles directly, especially not with the mess of coding this thing has. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Now include in {{Infobox Paris metro}}. Unused and no need to substitute. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was replace and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Infobox template for the stations of the Glasgow Subway. It doesn't have any specialised fields for maps or anything else, so perhaps it could be replaced with Template:Infobox station. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Template - This is a specialist template for a small network and it fulfills its purpose. No need for any other specialist fields such as maps as the template has been tuned for its purpose and does not need any other generic info.
- {{Infobox station}} is also the incorrect template to be suggested for an potential replacement. {{Infobox GB station}} would would be a better one to consider, however it would need significant editing to allow incorporation of the Glasgow Subway, especially when considering the one interchange station at Partick.
- In conclusion, {{Infobox SPT subway station}} meets its needs for the small number of Glasgow Subway stations it covers and replacing it with an existing UK railway station template would require significant editting for very little benefit. --Stewart (talk | edits) 23:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Replace and delete. The standard version works! Only use the part you need. You are not forced to enter a map, and there are already parameters skipped for most uses of this one. Is there something missing? See the comparison below. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Side by side comparison between Infobox SPT subway station and Infobox station | |
---|---|
{{Infobox SPT subway station |name = Partick |other_name = |image_name = Particksubway.jpg |caption = Platform for the Outer Circle service at Partick subway station |locale = [[Partick]] |subplat = 2 |subexits = 1.022 |years = 16 April 1980 |events = Opened }} |
{{Infobox station | name = Partick | type = | style = | image = Particksubway.jpg | image_caption = Platform for the Outer Circle service | address = Merkland Street, [[Partick]], [[Glasgow]] | country = [[Scotland]] | coordinates = {{Coord|55|52|11|N|4|18|31|W|type:railwaystation|display=inline}} | elevation = | line = <!-- line information is detailed under "services" --> | connections = ScotRail and local bus service | structure = Underground | platform = 2 [[side platform]]s | depth = | levels = | tracks = | parking = | bicycle = | opened = 16 April 1980 | architect = | closed = | rebuilt = | ADA = | code = | owned = | operator = [[Strathclyde Partnership for Transport]] | zone = G1 | smartcardname = [[ZoneCard]] | smartcardstatus = active | former = [[Merkland Street subway station]] | passengers = 1.022 million <small>(Citation needed)</small> | pass_year = | pass_percent = | pass_system = | mpassengers = | services = {{s-rail|title=Glasgow Subway}} {{rail line |previous = [[Govan subway station|Govan]] |next = [[Kelvinhall subway station|Kelvinhall]] |route = [[Glasgow Subway]] |col = {{temporary rail colour|FFA500}} }} }} |
- Replace and delete per Secondarywaltz. Mackensen (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- If this template is to be replaced {{Infobox station}} is not the correct replacement. {{Infobox GB station}} is more appropriate. A generic, fit just because you want to make it fit is not a reason for replacement. {{Infobox SPT subway station}} works, it is not broken, it is stable and there is no reason to mess around with it. --Stewart (talk | edits) 03:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- The purpose is to consolidate similar infoboxes. Try to create a test version based on Infobox GB station if you think that is a better option.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Six transclusions, these articles could use Template:Infobox fictional race instead. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. should be substituted. LT90001 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- This should most definitely not be substituted. It is coded using {{infobox}} and would leave a huge mess when you subst it. {{infobox}} should not be used directly anyways. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Replace with {{Infobox fictional race}} -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect after merging Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Two transclusions, could be replaced by Template:Infobox disease (which is also used for injuries caused by trauma instead of disease). eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete this should be superceded by Template:Infobox disease. LT90001 (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment shouldn't {{infobox disease}} be called {{infobox human disease}} ? -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- merge and redirect. Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Single use, can be replaced with Template:Infobox fictional artifact. eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 15:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Islam and Template:Allah. eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
We don't need this anymore. Portals now have a more practical way to be inserted. Moreover, this template has limited features: It won't support multiple portal and it supports up to 9 wikilinks. Apart from that it is better to have wikilinks as wikilinks in the wikicode instead as parameters to a template. Magioladitis (talk) 06:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete, and not even working as intended in some places (e.g., see this fix) since it doesn't support wiktionary, commonscat, etc. Frietjes (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment isn't this a substitution template? -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment this was previously nominated for deletion in 2007 -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is not a substitution template. I tried to substitute it in a test page and the results are not as expected. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete, useless template. — Lfdder (talk) 18:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unnecessary template. After removing all of the inappropriate links (redlinks, multiple links to the main article and external links) only one link remains. That link is to the main article and is the only article in which the template is used. AussieLegend (✉) 03:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete, now empty (was almost only redlinks and anchor links). Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete unused variant of the unreferenced template. This version should not be used, as it makes the unreferenced template appear in the topicon area, where cleanup templates should not appear, that is reserved for FA/GA icons, not cleanup notices. 70.24.249.39 (talk) 03:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –Quiddity (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete, non-standard. Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
In fact nothing more than a text box, used in just two articles. No need for a templates as the text can go straight into the article. The Banner talk 01:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Subst and delete not a template, simply a part of an article -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per above (I am the creator of this template). I have merged the templates back into the original articles. OSX (talk • contributions) 03:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
In fact nothing more than a text box, used in just two articles. No need for a templates as the text can go straight into the article. The Banner talk 01:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Subst and delete not a template, simply a part of an article -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per above (I am the creator of this template). I have merged the templates back into the original articles. OSX (talk • contributions) 03:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.