Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 9
September 9
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Tag highlight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Appears to be a duplicate of {{Clarify span}} and/or {{fix-span}}. We don't need a poorly-named duplicate of either one. Anomie⚔ 18:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- This template is intended to allow the relevant text before any tag to be highlighted, e. g., ({{vague}}, {{who}}, or {{by whom}}. I haven't found any other template that allows a tag's relevant text to be highlighted in this way. Jarble (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, it's probably a duplicate of {{fix span}}. I hadn't heard of that template until now. Jarble (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- This template is intended to allow the relevant text before any tag to be highlighted, e. g., ({{vague}}, {{who}}, or {{by whom}}. I haven't found any other template that allows a tag's relevant text to be highlighted in this way. Jarble (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks softball roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:LSU Lady Tigers softball roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters softball roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Southeastern Louisiana Lions softball roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Canisius Golden Griffins softball roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
single use templates which I merged with the articles, so they are no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Template which will only be included on one page. subst: and then delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- merged with article, so it can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Template:South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Nominating as part of the recent wave of discussion about the role, utility and correct placement of navboxes about geopolitical organizations. eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: not enough links left to justify a navbox after links to country articles are removed - see #Template:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development for explanation. — This, that and the other (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- delete per this, that. — Lfdder (talk) 08:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Useful for recognizing the members and navigating between their articles. Dimadick (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, per Dimadick, and leave the links in. Potentially useful links are not clutter. Bazonka (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per Dimadick. Useful for navigation and high-level overview (which is really the point of templates). CaseyPenk (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment - Before the relist, the above link given by User:This, that and the other went to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_31#Template:Organisation_for_Economic_Co-operation_and_Development -PC-XT+ 07:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Nominating as part of the recent wave of discussion about the role, utility and correct placement of navboxes about geopolitical organizations. eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: not enough links left to justify a navbox after links to country articles are removed - see #Template:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development for explanation. — This, that and the other (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- delete per this, that. — Lfdder (talk) 08:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Useful for recognizing the members and navigating between their articles. Dimadick (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, per Dimadick, and leave the links in. Potentially useful links are not clutter. Bazonka (talk) 09:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per Dimadick. Useful for navigation and high-level overview (which is really the point of templates). CaseyPenk (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment - Before the relist, the above link given by User:This, that and the other went to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_31#Template:Organisation_for_Economic_Co-operation_and_Development -PC-XT+ 07:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Good template. Needs improvement, but is just as important as for other regional union templates.--MarshalN20 | Talk 02:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.