Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 April 16
April 16
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
better served by a category. Frietjes (talk) 22:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox Kavajë (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
fork of {{infobox settlement}}, which I will promptly remove from Kavajë, where it was used to replace {{infobox settlement}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete T3 per nom -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was G7 speedy deletion — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Defunct team Spanneraol (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was G7 speedy deletion — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Defunct team Spanneraol (talk) 21:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Team is no longer operational so there is no need for a "current roster" Spanneraol (talk) 20:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 13:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Template for a team that never existed. It provides no real use to either of the articles it's tacked onto. QueenCake (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:37, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:VIXX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Given the few actual links, this template seems rather unnecessary. None of the actual albums, singles, performers etc. have articles, and the necessity for separate articles for discography, filmography, etc. is questionable. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Kelapstick is correct. Drmies (talk) 17:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Disagree on some points. At the very least, the discography, filmography should not even be considered for deletion as a separate article, some users have put in a lot of effort in creating those articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantasHelper987 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just leave the template alone?. It's just a template, it doesn't matter if it is necessary, the page might grow bigger and have more links to the contents like albums and performers, so deleting it will be a hassle.RandomEditor1989 (talk) 08:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete, not enough core working links. Frietjes (talk) 13:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:WikiProject Saskatchewan communities and neighbourhoods (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Replaced by Template:WikiProject Canada. 117Avenue (talk) 04:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.