Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 15

February 15

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wests Tigers 2010 squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wests Tigers 2011 squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wests Tigers 2013 squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded templates. Only being used in one article at most, and have now copied over the content to the relevant articles. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after merging with History of FirefoxPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Firefox release history english (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This Template is no longer used at all. Instead, the full table syntax is now copied into the Firefox Article. By the way, the whole point of Template:Version is to have only a single Template from which to write "Version history" tables. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 08:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roller coasters at Universal Studios Singapore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Universal Studios Singapore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Roller coasters at Universal Studios Singapore with Template:Universal Studios Singapore.
Per WP:NENAN. There are just four of these rides. The park template can just as easily take care of this. ...William 15:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Delete as not having enough relevant links to warrant a navigation template The Banner talk 01:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. (tJosve05a (c) 00:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.